Literature DB >> 23584275

Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Naoya Yoshida1, Masayuki Watanabe, Yoshifumi Baba, Shiro Iwagami, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Yasuo Sakamoto, Yuji Miyamoto, Nobuyuki Ozaki, Hideo Baba.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy are still common and are a major cause of mortality. The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for the occurrence of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.
METHODS: The clinical courses of 299 patients who underwent elective subtotal esophagectomy with lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Group I included patients who had pulmonary complications (n = 53), and group II included patients who did not (n = 246). The clinicopathological factors, surgical procedures and surgical results were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: The frequency of any pulmonary complication was 17.7 %. Pneumonia (n = 26; 8.7 %) and respiratory failure that needed initial ventilatory support for 48 h or reintubation (n = 16; 5.4 %) were the major morbidities. The results of the logistic regression analysis suggested that smoking with a Brinkman index ≥800, salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy and the amount of blood loss/body weight were independent factors associated with the occurrence of pulmonary complications.
CONCLUSION: Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy remain common despite advances in perioperative management. Cases with a history of heavy smoking, preoperative definitive chemoradiotherapy, and high blood loss during surgery require more careful postoperative pulmonary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584275     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0577-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  41 in total

1.  Endoscopic cervico-thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy.

Authors:  D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P G Devitt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with serious comorbidities.

Authors:  Naohiko Koide; Daisuke Takeuchi; Akira Suzuki; Shinichi Miyagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Transcervical superior mediastinal lymph node dissection combined with transhiatal lower esophageal dissection before transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach for salvage esophagectomy.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe; Naoya Yoshida; Ryuichi Karashima; Nobutaka Sato; Kotaro Hirashima; Yu Imamura; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Yohei Nagai; Shiro Iwagami; Eiichiro Toyama; Naoko Hayashi; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyata; Makoto Yamasaki; Shuji Takiguchi; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Toshiro Nishida; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Transthoracic oesophagectomy with lymphadenectomy in 100 oesophageal cancer patients: multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  V Valentí; J L Hernández-Lizoain; F Marínez-Regueira; M Bellver; J Rodríguez; J A Díaz González; W Torres; J J Sola; J Alvarez-Cienfuegos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Case volume as a predictor of inpatient mortality after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Michael Rodgers; Blair A Jobe; Robert W O'Rourke; Brett Sheppard; Brian Diggs; John G Hunter
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-09

Review 8.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Lagarde; Johannes B Reitsma; Anna-Karin D Maris; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo Obertop; Aelko H Zwinderman; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of ghrelin in the field of surgery.

Authors:  Shuji Takiguchi; Kohei Murakami; Yoshitomo Yanagimoto; Akihiro Takata; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.

Authors:  Kazushi Miyata; Masahide Fukaya; Keita Itatsu; Tetsuya Abe; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Correlation of fluid balance and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Xuezhong Xing; Yong Gao; Haijun Wang; Shining Qu; Chulin Huang; Hao Zhang; Hao Wang; Kelin Sun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Nondestructive measurement of esophageal biaxial mechanical properties utilizing sonometry.

Authors:  Johnathon M Aho; Bo Qiang; Dennis A Wigle; Daniel J Tschumperlin; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Airflow Limitation Predicts Postoperative Pneumonia after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Suguru Maruyama; Akihiko Okamura; Naoki Ishizuka; Yasukazu Kanie; Kei Sakamoto; Daisuke Fujiwara; Jun Kanamori; Yu Imamura; Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Esophageal Repair.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Yousuke Kinjo; Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) is useful to estimate the prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Kazuto Harada; Yoshifumi Baba; Keisuke Kosumi; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Koichi Kinoshita; Kenichi Nakamura; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Ryuichi Karashima; Kosuke Mima; Hiroshi Sawayama; Mayuko Ohuchi; Akira Chikamoto; Yu Imamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Clinical usefulness of the surgical Apgar score for estimating short-term and prognostic outcomes after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Impact of pretreatment asymptomatic renal dysfunction on clinical course after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yuki Kirihataya; Kohei Wakatsuki; Sohei Matsumoto; Hiroshi Nakade; Tomohiro Kunishige; Shintaro Miyao; Masayuki Sho
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.