Tomoyuki Okumura1, Yutaka Shimada2,3, Toru Watanabe2, Naomi Nakamichi4, Takuya Nagata2, Kazuhiro Tsukada2. 1. Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Sugitani 2630, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan. okumura@med.u-toyama.ac.jp. 2. Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Sugitani 2630, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan. 3. Department of Nanobio Drug Discovery, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Yoshida Shimoadachicho 46-29, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Toyama University Hospital, Sugitani 2630, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction following esophagectomy has been associated with the surgical disruption of muscle strength and flexibility of the oropharyngeal structures. We assessed the value of perioperative swallowing rehabilitation (SR) in patients who underwent radical esophagectomy. METHODS: We instituted routine perioperative SR for patients with esophageal cancer and retrospectively compared postoperative swallowing function between the patients who received (n = 12) vs. those who did not receive (n = 14) SR. RESULTS: The average duration of pre- and postoperative SR was 23.0 and 26.0 days, respectively. Preoperatively, the functional outcome assessment of the swallowing (FOAMS) score was 7 (full marks) in all 26 patients, whereas the average score at hospital discharge was 6.3 vs. 5.5 in the patients who received vs. those who did not receive SR, respectively (p = 0.049). Videofluoroscopic examination (n = 12) demonstrated that the maximum superior excursion of hyoid bone increased significantly with preoperative SR (p = 0.030), as well as postoperative SR (p = 0.046). However, perioperative SR did not reduce the incidence of postoperative aspiration pneumonia or the duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Swallowing function after radical esophagectomy was improved by perioperative SR; however, further investigations are needed to assess the clinical significance of SR in reducing surgical complications.
PURPOSE: Oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction following esophagectomy has been associated with the surgical disruption of muscle strength and flexibility of the oropharyngeal structures. We assessed the value of perioperative swallowing rehabilitation (SR) in patients who underwent radical esophagectomy. METHODS: We instituted routine perioperative SR for patients with esophageal cancer and retrospectively compared postoperative swallowing function between the patients who received (n = 12) vs. those who did not receive (n = 14) SR. RESULTS: The average duration of pre- and postoperative SR was 23.0 and 26.0 days, respectively. Preoperatively, the functional outcome assessment of the swallowing (FOAMS) score was 7 (full marks) in all 26 patients, whereas the average score at hospital discharge was 6.3 vs. 5.5 in the patients who received vs. those who did not receive SR, respectively (p = 0.049). Videofluoroscopic examination (n = 12) demonstrated that the maximum superior excursion of hyoid bone increased significantly with preoperative SR (p = 0.030), as well as postoperative SR (p = 0.046). However, perioperative SR did not reduce the incidence of postoperative aspiration pneumonia or the duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Swallowing function after radical esophagectomy was improved by perioperative SR; however, further investigations are needed to assess the clinical significance of SR in reducing surgical complications.
Authors: JoAnne Robbins; Ronald E Gangnon; Shannon M Theis; Stephanie A Kays; Angela L Hewitt; Jacqueline A Hind Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rafael Barrera; Weiji Shi; David Amar; Howard T Thaler; Natalie Gabovich; Manjit S Bains; Dorothy A White Journal: Chest Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Anna Gillman; Michelle Hayes; Greg Sheaf; Margaret Walshe; John V Reynolds; Julie Regan Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.430