Literature DB >> 22552194

Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Surya S A Y Biere1, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Kirsten W Maas, Luigi Bonavina, Camiel Rosman, Josep Roig Garcia, Suzanne S Gisbertz, Jean H G Klinkenbijl, Markus W Hollmann, Elly S M de Lange, H Jaap Bonjer, Donald L van der Peet, Miguel A Cuesta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is regarded as the only curative option for resectable oesophageal cancer, but pulmonary complications occurring in more than half of patients after open oesophagectomy are a great concern. We assessed whether minimally invasive oesophagectomy reduces morbidity compared with open oesophagectomy.
METHODS: We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at five study centres in three countries between June 1, 2009, and March 31, 2011. Patients aged 18-75 years with resectable cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive either open transthoracic or minimally invasive transthoracic oesophagectomy. Randomisation was stratified by centre. Patients, and investigators undertaking interventions, assessing outcomes, and analysing data, were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was pulmonary infection within the first 2 weeks after surgery and during the whole stay in hospital. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR TC 2452.
FINDINGS: We randomly assigned 56 patients to the open oesophagectomy group and 59 to the minimally invasive oesophagectomy group. 16 (29%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in the first 2 weeks compared with five (9%) in the minimally invasive group (relative risk [RR] 0·30, 95% CI 0·12-0·76; p=0·005). 19 (34%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in-hospital compared with seven (12%) in the minimally invasive group (0·35, 0·16-0·78; p=0·005). For in-hospital mortality, one patient in the open oesophagectomy group died from anastomotic leakage and two in the minimally invasive group from aspiration and mediastinitis after anastomotic leakage.
INTERPRETATION: These findings provide evidence for the short-term benefits of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. FUNDING: Digestive Surgery Foundation of the Unit of Digestive Surgery of the VU University Medical Centre.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22552194     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  444 in total

1.  Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.

Authors:  Kazushi Miyata; Masahide Fukaya; Keita Itatsu; Tetsuya Abe; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for patients with early esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Qian-Yun Wang; Jing-Pei Li; Lei Zhang; Nan-Qing Jiang; Zhong-Lin Wang; Xiao-Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.

Authors:  Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu; Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Moshim Kukar; Steven N Hochwald; Steven J Nurkin
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  Adrenal adenocarcinoma with Kartagener's syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Wanli Hu; Long Cheng; Bei Cheng; Peng Zhang; H E Xiao; Wenbo Wu; Xinghuan Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer: a review on sentinel node concept.

Authors:  Bogdan Filip; Marco Scarpa; Francesco Cavallin; Rita Alfieri; Matteo Cagol; Carlo Castoro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  [Surgical strategy for early stage carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  N Niclauss; M Chevallay; J L Frossard; S P Mönig
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Juha Kauppi; Jari Räsänen; Eero Sihvo; Riikka Huuhtanen; Kaisa Nelskylä; Jarmo Salo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Attaining Proficiency in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy While Maximizing Safety During Procedure Development.

Authors:  Inderpal S Sarkaria; Nabil P Rizk; Rachel Grosser; Debra Goldman; David J Finley; Amanda Ghanie; Camelia S Sima; Manjit S Bains; Prasad S Adusumilli; Valerie W Rusch; David R Jones
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.