| Literature DB >> 22888833 |
Mette Korshøj1, Peter Krustrup, Marie Birk Jørgensen, Eva Prescott, Åse Marie Hansen, Jesper Kristiansen, Jørgen Henrik Skotte, Ole Steen Mortensen, Karen Søgaard, Andreas Holtermann.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is unevenly distributed among occupational groups. The working environment, as well as lifestyle and socioeconomic status contribute to the disparity and variation in prevalence of these risk factors. High physical work demands have been shown to increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality, contrary to leisure time physical activity. High physical work demands in combination with a low cardiorespiratory fitness infer a high relative workload and an excessive risk for cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine whether a worksite aerobic exercise intervention will reduce the relative workload and cardiovascular risk factors by an increased cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS/Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22888833 PMCID: PMC3490923 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1Conception of the relative workload.
Figure 2Randomization procedure, multilevel design. The clusters are randomised into either reference (R) or intervention group (I). Stratum (A, B, C) are defined by the manager the participant reports to. Clusters are formed from geographical work location, gender, age and seniority. Clusters are paired according to number of participants, gender, age and seniority.
The plan and overview of the intervention mapping procedure
| Programme objectives | - decrease risk of cardiovascular disease | |
| - increase cardiorespiratory fitness | ||
| - cleaners | ||
| Theoretical methods | - > 60 % of VO2max > 60 min/week | |
| - worksite-adjusted intervention | ||
| Programme design | - facilitating specific worksite group | |
| - aerobic exercise sessions | ||
| - pilot study with cleaners | ||
| - adjusted aerobic exercise sessions | ||
| Adoption and implementation plan | - facilitating specific worksite group | |
| - registration of conducted planned activities | ||
| | - target group participation | |
| - logistic planning of work and activities | ||
| | - collaboration between organisation and researchers | |
| - activities planned in collaboration | ||
| Monitoring and evaluation plan | - participation registration | |
| | - on-going adjustments in aerobic exercise | |
| - increased cardiorespiratory fitness | ||
| | - decreased diurnal blood pressure | |
| | - improve self-rated work productivity | |
| | - reduce rate of RPE during work | |
| | - improve metabolic cardiovascular risk factors | |
| | - reduce the need for recovery | |
| | - reach of target group | |
| - delivering of activities | ||
| - receipt of activities |
Figure 3Conceptual model of the project. The model describes the intervention, the primary and the secondary outcomes.