Literature DB >> 17564722

Differences in physical workload, psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal disorders between two groups of female hospital cleaners with two diverse organizational models.

Jeannette Unge1, Kerstina Ohlsson, Catarina Nordander, Gert-Ake Hansson, Staffan Skerfving, Istvan Balogh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To clarify if differences in the physical workload, the psychosocial factors and in musculoskeletal disorders can be attributed to work organizational factors.
METHODS: The physical workload (muscular activity of m. trapezius, positions and movements of the head, upper arms and wrists and heart rate) was assessed in 24 female hospital cleaners working in a traditional work organization (TO) and in 22 working in an extended one (i.e. with an enlarged work content and more responsibilities; EO). The psychosocial work environment was assessed as job demand, decision latitude and social support in 135 (TO) and 111 (EO) cleaners, and disorders of the neck and upper extremity by a physical examination.
RESULTS: The EO group was associated with lower physical workload, in terms of heart rate ratio (23 vs 32; P<0.001), head and upper arm positions and movements (right upper arm, 50th percentile, 35 degrees/s vs 71 degrees/s; P<0.001) and wrist movements (20 degrees/s vs 27 degrees/s; P=0.001), than the TO group. The EO group reported higher decision latitude and lower work demand than the TO one, while we found no difference in social support. The prevalence of complaints and diagnoses in neck/shoulders were lower in the EO group (diagnoses 35% vs 48%; P=0.04). Moreover, the prevalence of subjects with at least ten physical finding in elbows/hands was lower in the EO group (10 vs 29; P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Hospital cleaners have a high prevalence of neck and upper limb disorders and a high physical workload. Comparing two groups of cleaners, with differences in the way of organizing the work, lower physical workload, more beneficial psychosocial factors and a better musculoskeletal health was found in the group with an extended organization. Hence, the differences found can be attributed to the organizational factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17564722     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-007-0208-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  44 in total

1.  Sensitivity of trapezius electromyography to differences between work tasks - influence of gap definition and normalisation methods.

Authors:  G A Hansson; C Nordander; P Asterland; K Ohlsson; U Strömberg; S Skerfving; D Rempel
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Physical workload on neck and upper limb using two CAD applications.

Authors:  Jeannette Unge Byström; Gert-Ake Hansson; Lars Rylander; Kerstina Ohlsson; Gabriella Källrot; Staffan Skerfving
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Wrist movements among females in a repetitive, non-forceful work.

Authors:  Inger Arvidsson; Ingrid Akesson; Gert Ake Hansson
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Interindividual variation of physical load in a work task.

Authors:  I Balogh; G A Hansson; K Ohlsson; U Strömberg; S Skerfving
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Precision of measurements of physical workload during standardised manual handling. Part I: surface electromyography of m. trapezius, m. infraspinatus and the forearm extensors.

Authors:  C Nordander; I Balogh; S E Mathiassen; K Ohlsson; J Unge; S Skerfving; G-A Hansson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Questionnaire versus direct technical measurements in assessing postures and movements of the head, upper back, arms and hands.

Authors:  G A Hansson; I Balogh; J U Byström; K Ohlsson; C Nordander; P Asterland; S Sjölander; L Rylander; J Winkel; S Skerfving
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Differences in the association between psychosocial work conditions and physical work load in female- and male-dominated occupations. MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group.

Authors:  M Josephson; G Pernold; G Ahlberg-Hultén; A Härenstam; T Theorell; E Vingård; M Waldenström; E W Hjelm
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

9.  Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; P M Bongers; M Douwes; M C Miedema; W E Hoogendoorn; G van der Wal; L M Bouter; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Psychosocial job factors and symptoms from the locomotor system--a multicausal analysis.

Authors:  T Theorell; K Harms-Ringdahl; G Ahlberg-Hultén; B Westin
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1991
View more
  22 in total

1.  Health disparities between immigrant and Danish cleaners.

Authors:  Marie B Jørgensen; Charlotte D N Rasmussen; Isabella G Carneiro; Mari-Ann Flyvholm; Kasper Olesen; Dorte Ekner; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  What characterizes cleaners sustaining good musculoskeletal health after years with physically heavy work?

Authors:  A Holtermann; A K Blangsted; H Christensen; K Hansen; K Søgaard
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Differences in the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among female and male custodians.

Authors:  Jennifer M Cavallari; Manik Ahuja; Alicia G Dugan; John D Meyer; Nancy Simcox; Sara Wakai; Jennifer L Garza
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Pressure pain sensitivity maps, self-reported musculoskeletal disorders and sickness absence among cleaners.

Authors:  Asbjørn Thalund Binderup; Andreas Holtermann; Karen Søgaard; Pascal Madeleine
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Is aerobic workload positively related to ambulatory blood pressure? A cross-sectional field study among cleaners.

Authors:  Mette Korshøj; Els Clays; Mark Lidegaard; Jørgen H Skotte; Andreas Holtermann; Peter Krustrup; Karen Søgaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Bias and imprecision in posture percentile variables estimated from short exposure samples.

Authors:  Svend Erik Mathiassen; Jens Wahlström; Mikael Forsman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Neck pain and postural balance among workers with high postural demands - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marie B Jørgensen; Jørgen H Skotte; Andreas Holtermann; Gisela Sjøgaard; Nicolas C Petersen; Karen Søgaard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  A randomised controlled trial among cleaners--effects on strength, balance and kinesiophobia.

Authors:  Marie Birk Jørgensen; John Ektor-Andersen; Gisela Sjøgaard; Andreas Holtermann; Karen Søgaard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Psychosocial Factors and Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Southeastern Asian Female Workers Living in Korea.

Authors:  Hyeonkyeong Lee; Hyunmi Ahn; Chang Gi Park; Sun Jung Kim; Sun Hye Moon
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-06-30

10.  Cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular workload and risk factors among cleaners; a cluster randomized worksite intervention.

Authors:  Mette Korshøj; Peter Krustrup; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Eva Prescott; Åse Marie Hansen; Jesper Kristiansen; Jørgen Henrik Skotte; Ole Steen Mortensen; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.