Dexter Canoy1. 1. Northwest Institute for Bio-Health Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. dexter.canoy@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Earlier studies investigating the risk of developing coronary heart disease in relation to body fat distribution showed inconsistent results, and any sex-related difference in disease risk has not been adequately examined. This review aims to assess current findings on the prospective association between body fat distribution measures and coronary heart disease in men and women. RECENT FINDINGS: Current epidemiologic evidence suggests that waist circumference and waist-hip ratio, as indicators of abdominal adiposity, are positively related to coronary heart disease in men and women independently of body mass index and conventional coronary heart disease risk factors. But the magnitude and shape of the associations for these abdominal adiposity indices varied with adjustments for mediating and confounding factors. Interestingly, hip waist circumference was inversely associated with coronary heart disease after adjusting for waist circumference. Because waist and hips are positively correlated but have separate and opposite associations with coronary disease, using waist circumference alone may provide underestimated risk estimate if hip girth is not accounted for in the calculation of this risk. SUMMARY: For adipose tissue distribution assessment to be clinically useful, the ideal adiposity phenotype should provide a single risk estimate that captures the separate 'effects' of abdominal and peripheral adiposity. Although far from perfect, waist-hip ratio may capture separate effects of central and peripheral adiposity. This simple and inexpensive measure could be used to help improve coronary heart disease risk assessment.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Earlier studies investigating the risk of developing coronary heart disease in relation to body fat distribution showed inconsistent results, and any sex-related difference in disease risk has not been adequately examined. This review aims to assess current findings on the prospective association between body fat distribution measures and coronary heart disease in men and women. RECENT FINDINGS: Current epidemiologic evidence suggests that waist circumference and waist-hip ratio, as indicators of abdominal adiposity, are positively related to coronary heart disease in men and women independently of body mass index and conventional coronary heart disease risk factors. But the magnitude and shape of the associations for these abdominal adiposity indices varied with adjustments for mediating and confounding factors. Interestingly, hip waist circumference was inversely associated with coronary heart disease after adjusting for waist circumference. Because waist and hips are positively correlated but have separate and opposite associations with coronary disease, using waist circumference alone may provide underestimated risk estimate if hip girth is not accounted for in the calculation of this risk. SUMMARY: For adipose tissue distribution assessment to be clinically useful, the ideal adiposity phenotype should provide a single risk estimate that captures the separate 'effects' of abdominal and peripheral adiposity. Although far from perfect, waist-hip ratio may capture separate effects of central and peripheral adiposity. This simple and inexpensive measure could be used to help improve coronary heart disease risk assessment.
Authors: Mengyuan Kan; Paul L Auer; Gao T Wang; Kristine L Bucasas; Stanley Hooker; Alejandra Rodriguez; Biao Li; Jaclyn Ellis; L Adrienne Cupples; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Josée Dupuis; Caroline S Fox; Myron D Gross; Joshua D Smith; Nancy Heard-Costa; James B Meigs; James S Pankow; Jerome I Rotter; David Siscovick; James G Wilson; Jay Shendure; Rebecca Jackson; Ulrike Peters; Hua Zhong; Danyu Lin; Li Hsu; Nora Franceschini; Chris Carlson; Goncalo Abecasis; Stacey Gabriel; Michael J Bamshad; David Altshuler; Deborah A Nickerson; Kari E North; Leslie A Lange; Alexander P Reiner; Suzanne M Leal Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Nicole Niehoff; Alexandra J White; Lauren E McCullough; Susan E Steck; Jan Beyea; Irina Mordukhovich; Jing Shen; Alfred I Neugut; Kathleen Conway; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: R K Simmons; K G M M Alberti; E A M Gale; S Colagiuri; J Tuomilehto; Q Qiao; A Ramachandran; N Tajima; I Brajkovich Mirchov; A Ben-Nakhi; G Reaven; B Hama Sambo; S Mendis; G Roglic Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Chelsea K Raulerson; Arthur Ko; John C Kidd; Kevin W Currin; Sarah M Brotman; Maren E Cannon; Ying Wu; Cassandra N Spracklen; Anne U Jackson; Heather M Stringham; Ryan P Welch; Christian Fuchsberger; Adam E Locke; Narisu Narisu; Aldons J Lusis; Mete Civelek; Terrence S Furey; Johanna Kuusisto; Francis S Collins; Michael Boehnke; Laura J Scott; Dan-Yu Lin; Michael I Love; Markku Laakso; Päivi Pajukanta; Karen L Mohlke Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 11.025