OBJECTIVES: The change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) over an 8-year period was explored in groups defined according to exposure to shift work, occupational noise, and physical workload. The impact of baseline SBP and its increase in relation to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk due to these exposures was also studied. METHODS: The study cohorts (N=1288 for CHD follow-up, N=884 for SBP follow-up) consisted of industrially employed middle-aged men from the Helsinki Heart Study. Shiftwork status was obtained from a questionnaire, and other exposures were determined with the Finnish job-exposure matrix. SBP was measured in the Helsinki Heart Study, and CHD end points were obtained from official Finnish registers. The joint effects of baseline SBP, its change, and the exposure in question were estimated via Cox s regression models. RESULTS: During the SBP follow-up, the steepest SBP gradient was found for physical workload only and physical workload combined with noise; shift work alone or combined with noise primarily entailed a lower mean SBP level than no such exposure. However, the shift workers had a relative risk of 1.71 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-2.87] even without an increase in SBP, but, with a baseline SBP of > or = 140 mmHg and an additional increase, their relative risk rose to 4.62 (95% CI 2.31-9.24) when they were compared with day workers with an SBP of <140 mmHg and no increase. CONCLUSIONS: In general, shift workers do not develop higher SBP levels than day workers, but, if they do, it entails high CHD risk. Noise shows a similar pattern. In contrast, physical workload entails a significant increase in SBP, and SBP is a key pathway to CHD risk.
OBJECTIVES: The change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) over an 8-year period was explored in groups defined according to exposure to shift work, occupational noise, and physical workload. The impact of baseline SBP and its increase in relation to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk due to these exposures was also studied. METHODS: The study cohorts (N=1288 for CHD follow-up, N=884 for SBP follow-up) consisted of industrially employed middle-aged men from the Helsinki Heart Study. Shiftwork status was obtained from a questionnaire, and other exposures were determined with the Finnish job-exposure matrix. SBP was measured in the Helsinki Heart Study, and CHD end points were obtained from official Finnish registers. The joint effects of baseline SBP, its change, and the exposure in question were estimated via Cox s regression models. RESULTS: During the SBP follow-up, the steepest SBP gradient was found for physical workload only and physical workload combined with noise; shift work alone or combined with noise primarily entailed a lower mean SBP level than no such exposure. However, the shift workers had a relative risk of 1.71 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-2.87] even without an increase in SBP, but, with a baseline SBP of > or = 140 mmHg and an additional increase, their relative risk rose to 4.62 (95% CI 2.31-9.24) when they were compared with day workers with an SBP of <140 mmHg and no increase. CONCLUSIONS: In general, shift workers do not develop higher SBP levels than day workers, but, if they do, it entails high CHD risk. Noise shows a similar pattern. In contrast, physical workload entails a significant increase in SBP, and SBP is a key pathway to CHD risk.
Authors: Jacob Sattelmair; Jeremy Pertman; Eric L Ding; Harold W Kohl; William Haskell; I-Min Lee Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sara Gamboa Madeira; Carina Fernandes; Teresa Paiva; Carlos Santos Moreira; Daniel Caldeira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mette Korshøj; Peter Krustrup; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Eva Prescott; Åse Marie Hansen; Jesper Kristiansen; Jørgen Henrik Skotte; Ole Steen Mortensen; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 3.295