Literature DB >> 22870851

Hip fractures in Norway 1999-2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates: a NOREPOS study.

Tone K Omsland1, Kristin Holvik, Haakon E Meyer, Jacqueline R Center, Nina Emaus, Grethe S Tell, Berit Schei, Aage Tverdal, Clara G Gjesdal, Guri Grimnes, Siri Forsmo, John A Eisman, Anne Johanne Søgaard.   

Abstract

Declining incidences of hip fractures are reported from western countries. Norway has among the highest rates in the world. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in total hip fracture rates in Norway between 1999 and 2008 and risk of second hip fractures. All hospitalizations given a hip fracture diagnosis code (International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 or ICD 10) (cervical, trochanteric or subtrochanteric) in Norwegian hospitals were retrieved with accompanying surgical procedure codes and additional diagnoses. A total of 93,123 hip fractures were identified between 1999 and 2008 in persons ≥50 years. Annual incidences of hip fractures were calculated and tested for trends. Rates of first and second hip fractures (2006-2008) were compared. The age-standardized total incidence of hip fracture decreased by 13.4 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 11.0-15.6) in women and 4.8 % (95 % CI: 0.7, 8.7) in men. Age-adjusted rates of second hip fractures did not change in the observation period. In those with a prior hip fracture, the age-standardized risk of a subsequent hip fracture was 2.5-fold (95 % CI: 2.5, 2.6) in women, and 4.6-fold (95 % CI: 4.5, 4.7) in men. Total hip fracture rates declined in both genders during 1999-2008, whereas rates of second hip fractures did not change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22870851     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-012-9711-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  29 in total

1.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in Austria: evidence for a change in the secular trend.

Authors:  H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; T Pieber; H Resch; E Zwettler; M Chandran; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The risk of a second hip fracture in patients after their first hip fracture.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Takeshi Sawaguchi; Naoto Endo; Yasuyo Ito; Tetsuo Nakano; Yoshinobu Watanabe
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Change in height, weight and body mass index: Longitudinal data from the HUNT Study in Norway.

Authors:  W B Drøyvold; T I L Nilsen; O Krüger; T L Holmen; S Krokstad; K Midthjell; J Holmen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Ten-year hip fracture incidence rate trends in a large California population, 1997-2006.

Authors:  A L Adams; J Shi; M Takayanagi; R M Dell; T T Funahashi; S J Jacobsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  C De Laet; J A Kanis; A Odén; H Johanson; O Johnell; P Delmas; J A Eisman; H Kroger; S Fujiwara; P Garnero; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; P J Meunier; H A P Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Incidence of hip fracture in southeastern Norway: a study of 1,730 cervical and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  K Bjørgul; O Reikerås
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; C De Laet; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; H Kroger; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Hip fracture patients at risk of second hip fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study of 169,145 cases during 1977-2001.

Authors:  Jesper Ryg; Lars Rejnmark; Soren Overgaard; Kim Brixen; Peter Vestergaard
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Timing of subsequent fractures after an initial fracture.

Authors:  Tineke A C M van Geel; Kirsten M B Huntjens; Joop P W van den Bergh; Geert-Jan Dinant; Piet P Geusens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  The epidemic of hip fractures: are we on the right track?

Authors:  Klaas A Hartholt; Christian Oudshoorn; Stephanie M Zielinski; Paul T P W Burgers; Martien J M Panneman; Ed F van Beeck; Peter Patka; Tischa J M van der Cammen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  38 in total

1.  The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Continued decline in hip fracture incidence in Norway: a NOREPOS study.

Authors:  A J Søgaard; K Holvik; H E Meyer; G S Tell; C G Gjesdal; N Emaus; G Grimnes; B Schei; S Forsmo; T K Omsland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Forecasting the burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures.

Authors:  T K Omsland; J H Magnus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Excess mortality following hip fracture: impact of self-perceived health, smoking, and body mass index. A NOREPOS study.

Authors:  S M Solbakken; H E Meyer; H Stigum; A J Søgaard; K Holvik; J H Magnus; T K Omsland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Subsequent contralateral hip fractures: can at-risk patients be identified? An observational study of 5,102 patients.

Authors:  Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum; Valér Džupa; Radek Bartoška; Daniel Říha; Petr Waldauf; Václav Báča
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Identifying Low Muscle Mass in Patients with Hip Fracture: Validation of Biolectrical Impedance Analysis and Anthropometry Compared to Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  O M Steihaug; C G Gjesdal; B Bogen; A H Ranhoff
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Social inequality and fractures-secular trends in the Danish population: a case-control study.

Authors:  L Hansen; A Judge; M K Javaid; C Cooper; P Vestergaard; B Abrahamsen; N C Harvey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Temporal trends in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S N Morin; L M Lix; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Vitamin D status and complications, readmissions, and mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  F Ingstad; L B Solberg; L Nordsletten; P M Thorsby; I Hestnes; F Frihagen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Hip fracture incidence 2003-2013 and projected cases until 2050 in Austria: a population-based study.

Authors:  Hans Concin; Wolfgang Brozek; Karl-Peter Benedetto; Hartmut Häfele; Joachim Kopf; Thomas Bärenzung; Richard Schnetzer; Christian Schenk; Elmar Stimpfl; Ursula Waheed-Hutter; Hanno Ulmer; Kilian Rapp; Elisabeth Zwettler; Gabriele Nagel
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.