Literature DB >> 15175845

Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

J A Kanis1, O Johnell, A Oden, H Johansson, C De Laet, J A Eisman, S Fujiwara, H Kroger, E V McCloskey, D Mellstrom, L J Melton, H Pols, J Reeve, A Silman, A Tenenhouse.   

Abstract

Smoking is widely considered a risk factor for future fracture. The aim of this study was to quantify this risk on an international basis and to explore the relationship of this risk with age, sex and bone mineral density (BMD). We studied 59,232 men and women (74% female) from ten prospective cohorts comprising EVOS/EPOS, DOES, CaMos, Rochester, Sheffield, Rotterdam, Kuopio, Hiroshima and two cohorts from Gothenburg. Cohorts were followed for a total of 250,000 person-years. The effect of current or past smoking, on the risk of any fracture, any osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture alone was examined using a Poisson model for each sex from each cohort. Covariates examined were age, sex and BMD. The results of the different studies were merged using the weighted beta-coefficients. Current smoking was associated with a significantly increased risk of any fracture compared to non-smokers (RR=1.25; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=1.15-1.36). Risk ratio (RR) was adjusted marginally downward when account was taken of BMD, but it remained significantly increased (RR=1.13). For an osteoporotic fracture, the risk was marginally higher (RR=1.29; 95% CI=1.13-1.28). The highest risk was observed for hip fracture (RR=1.84; 95% CI=1.52-2.22), but this was also somewhat lower after adjustment for BMD (RR=1.60; 95% CI=1.27-2.02). Risk ratios were significantly higher in men than in women for all fractures and for osteoporotic fractures, but not for hip fracture. Low BMD accounted for only 23% of the smoking-related risk of hip fracture. Adjustment for body mass index had a small downward effect on risk for all fracture outcomes. For osteoporotic fracture, the risk ratio increased with age, but decreased with age for hip fracture. A smoking history was associated with a significantly increased risk of fracture compared with individuals with no smoking history, but the risk ratios were lower than for current smoking. We conclude that a history of smoking results in fracture risk that is substantially greater than that explained by measurement of BMD. Its validation on an international basis permits the use of this risk factor in case finding strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175845     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1640-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  45 in total

1.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Risk factors for perimenopausal fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Risk factors for hip fracture in a Japanese cohort.

Authors:  S Fujiwara; F Kasagi; M Yamada; K Kodama
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Hormone replacement therapy and hip fracture risk: effect modification by tobacco smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and body mass index.

Authors:  S Høidrup; M Grønbaek; A T Pedersen; J B Lauritzen; A Gottschau; M Schroll
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A meta-analysis of cigarette smoking, bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture: recognition of a major effect.

Authors:  M R Law; A K Hackshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-04

7.  Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall; I Persson; R Bergström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES).

Authors:  G Jones; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; C Gilbert; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Relative contributions of bone density, bone turnover, and clinical risk factors to long-term fracture prediction.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; Cynthia S Crowson; W Michael O'Fallon; Heinz W Wahner; B Lawrence Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  275 in total

1.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in Austria: evidence for a change in the secular trend.

Authors:  H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; T Pieber; H Resch; E Zwettler; M Chandran; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Development and use of FRAX in osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; A Oden; O Ström; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The need for a transparent, ethical, and successful relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry: a view of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES).

Authors:  O Bruyere; J A Kanis; M-E Ibar-Abadie; N Alsayed; M L Brandi; N Burlet; D L Cahall; A Chines; J-P Devogelaer; W Dere; N Goel; N Hughes; J-M Kaufman; S Korte; B H Mitlak; D Niese; R Rizzoli; L C Rovati; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Vertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women: a population-based study.

Authors:  L Cui; L Chen; W Xia; Y Jiang; L Cui; W Huang; W Wang; X Wang; Y Pei; X Zheng; Q Wang; Z Ning; M Li; O Wang; X Xing; Q Lin; W Yu; X Weng; L Xu; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Association between loop diuretic use and fracture risk.

Authors:  F Xiao; X Qu; Z Zhai; C Jiang; H Li; X Liu; Z Ouyang; D Gu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Osteoporosis and Periodontitis.

Authors:  Chin-Wei Jeff Wang; Laurie K McCauley
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Economic evaluation of osteoporosis liaison service for secondary fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with previous hip fracture in Japan.

Authors:  K Moriwaki; S Noto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better?

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Li-Yung Lui; Brent C Taylor; John T Schousboe; Meghan G Donaldson; Howard A Fink; Jane A Cauley; Teresa A Hillier; Warren S Browner; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

10.  The effect of vigorous physical activity and risk of wrist fracture over 25 years in a low-risk survivor cohort.

Authors:  Donna L Thorpe; Synnove F Knutsen; W Lawrence Beeson; Gary E Fraser
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.