Literature DB >> 17033761

Incidence of hip fracture in southeastern Norway: a study of 1,730 cervical and trochanteric fractures.

K Bjørgul1, O Reikerås.   

Abstract

The incidence of hip fracture has been studied extensively, but there is still some doubt whether the age-specific incidence is increasing. The proportion of trochanteric fractures has varied and has also been said to be increasing. We studied data on 1,730 prospectively registered cases from 1998-2003 and computed age- and gender-specific incidence rates for intracapsular and trochanteric fractures. The incidence of hip fracture for women over 50 years was 1,263 and for men 452 per 100,000. The proportion of trochanteric fractures was 38% for women and 41% for men. There was no significant difference in the proportion of trochanteric fractures either between or within the genders, and the proportion did not exceed 50% in any age group. These findings confirm the high incidence of hip fracture in Norway but do not indicate any increase. The proportion of trochanteric fractures also seems to be stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17033761      PMCID: PMC2266638          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of the age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures between urban and rural areas: the difference is not related to the prevalence of institutions for the elderly.

Authors:  T Chevalley; F R Herrmann; M Delmi; R Stern; P Hoffmeyer; C H Rapin; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?

Authors:  C A Mautalen; E M Vega; T A Einhorn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Incidence of hip fractures in Malmö, Sweden, 1992-1995. A trend-break.

Authors:  C Rogmark; I Sernbo; O Johnell; J A Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-02

4.  Incidence of hip fracture in Oslo, Norway: differences within the city.

Authors:  T S Kaastad; H E Meyer; J A Falch
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; G C Nicholson; A M Ugoni; E Seeman; J A Pasco; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Low incidence of hip fractures in an equatorial area.

Authors:  Francisco Airton Castro da Rocha; Ana Regina Ribeiro
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Decreasing incidence of hip fracture in the Funen County, Denmark.

Authors:  Tine Nymark; Jens M Lauritsen; Ole Ovesen; Niels D Röck; Bernard Jeune
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  High incidence rate of hip fracture in Taiwan: estimated from a nationwide health insurance database.

Authors:  W C Chie; R S Yang; J P Liu; K S Tsai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Hip fracture incidence in central norway: a followup study.

Authors:  Vilhjalmur Finsen; Lars G Johnsen; Gerd Tranø; Bjørn Hansen; Kathrin Sørensen Sneve
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Epidemiology of hip fractures among the elderly. Risk factors for fracture type.

Authors:  J D Michelson; A Myers; R Jinnah; Q Cox; M Van Natta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  44 in total

1.  Femoral fractures in the extremely elderly.

Authors:  Giulio Guido; Stefano Giannotti; Vanna Bottai; Marco Ghilardi; Maria Giulia Bianchi; Michael James Ceglia
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-05

Review 2.  Features of limb fractures: a review of epidemiology from a Japanese perspective.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Epidemiology of osteoporotic hip fractures in Western Romania.

Authors:  Dan V Poenaru; Radu Prejbeanu; Popa Iulian; Horia Haragus; Emilian Popovici; Ionut Golet; Dinu Vermesan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  An increase in the incidence of hip fractures in Tangshan, China.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Tian; Liu Zhang; Hai-Yong Zhao; Chun-Yu Liang; Nan Zhang; Hui-Ping Song
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Psychotropics and weak opioid analgesics in plasma samples of older hip fracture patients - detection frequencies and consistency with drug records.

Authors:  Ragnhild Birkeland Waade; Espen Molden; Mette Irene Martinsen; Monica Hermann; Anette Hylen Ranhoff
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  S Y Cheng; A R Levy; K A Lefaivre; P Guy; L Kuramoto; B Sobolev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age.

Authors:  David A Tanner; Marita Kloseck; Richard G Crilly; Bert Chesworth; Jason Gilliland
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Unchanging incidence of hip fracture in southeastern norway.

Authors:  Sam Polesie; Ulf Sigurdsen; Kristian Bjørgul
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

9.  Gender and Age Differences in Hip Fracture Types among Elderly: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kalliopi Alpantaki; Chrysoula Papadaki; Konstantinos Raptis; Konstantinos Dretakis; George Samonis; Christos Koutserimpas
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2020-06

10.  Comparison of hip fracture incidence and trends between Germany and Austria 1995-2004: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Eva Mann; Gabriele Meyer; Burkhart Haastert; Andrea Icks
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.