Literature DB >> 25566752

Subsequent contralateral hip fractures: can at-risk patients be identified? An observational study of 5,102 patients.

Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum1, Valér Džupa, Radek Bartoška, Daniel Říha, Petr Waldauf, Václav Báča.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a sample of patients who sustained hip fractures during the years 1997-2011 and identify risk factors for a subsequent contralateral hip fracture; one-year mortality rates were compared in both groups.
METHODS: A total of 5,102 patients with hip fractures were prospectively studied to identify patients who had also suffered a subsequent, contralateral, hip fracture (SCHF). Those patients who had sustained a second fracture within 18 months of the initial fracture were then studied. All data were statistically processed.
RESULTS: Within 18 months of the first fracture, a SCHF occurred in 105 patients (2.1 %). These patients were an average of three years older than those in the single fracture group. Risk factors for the development of a SCHF included: female gender, residing in a residential care facility, and limited mobility prior to injury. Trochanteric fractures did not represent a statistically significant risk factor for SCHF. More than three-quarters of patients with subsequent injuries suffered the same type of fractures on the opposite side. Patients with subsequent fractures had lower one-year mortality rates than patients with only one fracture.
CONCLUSION: Patients at greatest risk for a SCHF were women with limited mobility who resided in nursing homes for the elderly. The lower mortality rate associated with second fractures shows that the prognosis for such patients is good. Since the at-risk group is so well defined, prophylactic measures for these patients should be utilized in order to minimize the risk of additional fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25566752     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2646-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  26 in total

1.  Contralateral hip fractures - can predisposing factors be determined?

Authors:  P Saxena; J Shankar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  An economic analysis of external hip protector use in ambulatory nursing facility residents.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Santanu K Datta; David B Matchar
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum; Jan Bartoníček; Daniel Ríha; Petr Waldauf; Valér Džupa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Are hip protectors cost effective?

Authors:  B A Kumar; M J Parker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Age-specific incidence of first and second fractures of the hip.

Authors:  T M Lawrence; R Wenn; C T Boulton; C G Moran
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-02

6.  Outcome following a second hip fracture.

Authors:  E O Pearse; D J Redfern; M Sinha; A J Edge
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Bilateral fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  D A Boston
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Occurrence and incidence of the second hip fracture.

Authors:  H M Schrøder; K K Petersen; M Erlandsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Cost-effectiveness of hip protectors in the prevention of osteoporosis related hip fractures in elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  Sonia Singh; Huiying Sun; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jorma Panula; Harri Pihlajamäki; Ville M Mattila; Pekka Jaatinen; Tero Vahlberg; Pertti Aarnio; Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contra-lateral hip fracture in the elderly: are decreased body mass index and skin thickness predictive factors?

Authors:  Jean-Charles Aurégan; Aurélien Frison; Thierry Bégué; Didier Hannouche; Catherine Bosser; Morad Bensidhoum; Thierry Hoc
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparative analysis of non-simultaneous bilateral fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Franz Müller; Michael Galler; Michael Zellner; Christian Bäuml; Christina Roll; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.693

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.