Literature DB >> 24980184

Forecasting the burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures.

T K Omsland1, J H Magnus.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: A growing elderly population is expected worldwide, and the rate of hip fractures is decisive for the future fracture burden. Significant declines in hip fracture rates in Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK are required to counteract the impact of the ageing effects.
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the consequences of the expected growth of the elderly population worldwide on the hip fracture burden using Norway as an example. Furthermore, we wanted to estimate the decline in hip fracture rates required to counteract the anticipated increase in the burden of hip fracture for Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK.
METHODS: The burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures in Norway were estimated given (1) constant age-specific rates, (2) continued decline, and (3) different cohort scenarios. Based on population projection estimates and population age-specific hip fracture rates in women 65 years and older, we calculated the required declines in hip fracture rates needed to counteract the growing elderly populations in Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK.
RESULTS: The level of age-specific hip fracture rates had a huge impact on the future hip fracture burden in Norway. Even if the hip fracture rates decline at the same speed, a 22 % increase in the burden of hip fractures can be expected by 2040. An annual decline in hip fracture rates of 1.1-2.2 % until 2040 is required to counteract the effects of the growing elderly population on the future burden of hip fractures in Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK.
CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture rates have a great impact on the burden of hip fractures. The rates will have to decline significantly to counteract the impact of a growing elderly population. A change in preventive strategies and further studies are warranted to identify the complex causes associated to hip fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980184     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2781-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  15 in total

1.  Secular trends in Swedish hip fractures 1987-2002: birth cohort and period effects.

Authors:  Björn E Rosengren; Henrik G Ahlborg; Dan Mellström; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Jonas Björk; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada: an age-period-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Sonia Jean; Siobhan O'Donnell; Claudia Lagacé; Peter Walsh; Christina Bancej; Jacques P Brown; Suzanne Morin; Alexandra Papaioannou; Susan B Jaglal; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Hip fractures in Norway 1999-2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates: a NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Tone K Omsland; Kristin Holvik; Haakon E Meyer; Jacqueline R Center; Nina Emaus; Grethe S Tell; Berit Schei; Aage Tverdal; Clara G Gjesdal; Guri Grimnes; Siri Forsmo; John A Eisman; Anne Johanne Søgaard
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Cooper; Z A Cole; C R Holroyd; S C Earl; N C Harvey; E M Dennison; L J Melton; S R Cummings; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Trends in hip fracture incidence rates among the elderly in Sweden 1987-2009.

Authors:  Finn Nilson; Syed Moniruzzaman; Johanna Gustavsson; Ragnar Andersson
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  Epidemiological burden of postmenopausal osteoporosis in the UK from 2010 to 2021: estimations from a disease model.

Authors:  Aline Gauthier; John A Kanis; Yling Jiang; Monique Martin; Juliet E Compston; Fredrik Borgström; Cyrus Cooper; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States.

Authors:  Carmen A Brauer; Marcelo Coca-Perraillon; David M Cutler; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Continuous decline in incidence of hip fracture: nationwide statistics from Finland between 1970 and 2010.

Authors:  N Korhonen; S Niemi; J Parkkari; H Sievänen; M Palvanen; P Kannus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Declining incidence of hip fractures and the extent of use of anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark 1997-2006.

Authors:  B Abrahamsen; P Vestergaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Burden of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany: estimations from a disease model.

Authors:  A Gauthier; J A Kanis; Y Jiang; K Dreinhöfer; M Martin; J Compston; F Borgström; C Cooper; E McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  18 in total

1.  Continued decline in hip fracture incidence in Norway: a NOREPOS study.

Authors:  A J Søgaard; K Holvik; H E Meyer; G S Tell; C G Gjesdal; N Emaus; G Grimnes; B Schei; S Forsmo; T K Omsland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Impact of prescription drugs on second fragility fractures among US Medicare patients.

Authors:  J C Munson; J P W Bynum; J-E Bell; C McDonough; Q Wang; T Tosteson; A N A Tosteson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Odanacatib: a review of its potential in the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Roland D Chapurlat
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  Patterns of Opioid Use in the 12 Months Following Geriatric Fragility Fractures: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael T Torchia; Jeffrey Munson; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Christine M McDonough; Tamara S Morgan; Julie P W Bynum; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  The association between alcohol consumption and risk of hip fracture differs by age and gender in Cohort of Norway: a NOREPOS study.

Authors:  A J Søgaard; A H Ranhoff; H E Meyer; T K Omsland; W Nystad; G S Tell; K Holvik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Grip strength in men and women aged 50-79 years is associated with non-vertebral osteoporotic fracture during 15 years follow-up: The Tromsø Study 1994-1995.

Authors:  A J Søgaard; J H Magnus; Å Bjørnerem; K Holvik; A H Ranhoff; N Emaus; H E Meyer; B H Strand
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Chlorogenic Acid Prevents Osteoporosis by Shp2/PI3K/Akt Pathway in Ovariectomized Rats.

Authors:  Rong Ping Zhou; Si Jian Lin; Wen Bing Wan; Hui Ling Zuo; Fen Fen Yao; Hui Bing Ruan; Jin Xu; Wei Song; Yi Cheng Zhou; Shi Yao Wen; Jiang Hua Dai; Mei Lan Zhu; Jun Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Patterns of Prescription Drug Use Before and After Fragility Fracture.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Munson; Julie P W Bynum; John-Erik Bell; Robert Cantu; Christine McDonough; Qianfei Wang; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Hydroxyapatite coated hip hemiarthroplasty: Morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Fazal; Sunil Shah; Padmanabhan Subramanian
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-05-08

10.  Ethnic differences in risk of hip fracture in Norway: a NOREPOS study.

Authors:  G Aamodt; R Renolen; T K Omsland; H E Meyer; K S Rabanal; A J Søgaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.