Literature DB >> 1974940

Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.

A Saari-Kemppainen1, O Karjalainen, P Ylöstalo, O P Heinonen.   

Abstract

During a 19-month period, 95% of all pregnant women in the greater Helsinki area, Finland, entered a study to compare one-stage ultrasonography screening with selective screening according to antenatal hospital use, obstetric procedures, and fetal outcomes. Of 9310 women who entered the trial, 4691 were randomly allocated to ultrasound screening between the 16th and 20th gestational weeks and 4619 to follow-up only. Screened and control groups otherwise had the same antenatal care, which included ultrasonography according to usual practice. Screened women made fewer visits to the antenatal outpatient clinic than did women in the control group (2.3 vs 2.6). There were no differences in the number of labour inductions or mean birthweights in the two groups. Perinatal mortality was significantly lower in the screened than in the control group (4.6/1000 vs 9.0/1000); this 49.2% reduction was mainly due to improved early detection of major malformations which led to induced abortion. All twin pregnancies were detected before the 21st gestational week in the screening group compared with 76.3% in the control group; perinatal mortality in the small series of twins was 27.8/1000 vs 65.8/1000, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1974940     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91941-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  37 in total

Review 1.  Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: an ultrasonographic marker for adverse fetal and neonatal outcome?

Authors:  Maria Antonietta De Oronzo
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-01

Review 3.  What is the evidence based role of US in evaluating the fetus?

Authors:  Dorothy I Bulas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

4.  Even a single third trimester antenatal fetal screening for congenital anomalies can be life saving.

Authors:  Monika Bawa; Narasimhan Laksmi Kannan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Four-year experience with prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects at a single referral center in Japan with focus on inaccurately diagnosed cases.

Authors:  Yukako Yoshikane; Toshiyuki Yoshizato; Yoshiko Otake; Naoki Fusazaki; Hirotsugu Obama; Shingo Miyamoto; Shinichi Hirose
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Echocardiographic detection of congenital heart disease in the fetus: present and future.

Authors:  L D Allan
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-08

Review 7.  Advances in genetics.

Authors:  M M Lees; R M Winter
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Commentary: evidence based practice and antenatal ultrasonography--the need for more studies.

Authors:  P Chamberlain; P A Boyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-16

9.  Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development.

Authors:  K A Salvesen; L J Vatten; S H Eik-Nes; K Hugdahl; L S Bakketeig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17

10.  Fetal weight normograms for singleton pregnancies in a Jordanian population.

Authors:  Nahla Subhi Al-Bayyari; Adel Taha Abu-Heija
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.