Literature DB >> 22855820

A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention.

Risa Sawaki1, Joy J Geng, Steven J Luck.   

Abstract

Much is known about the mechanisms by which attention is focused to facilitate perception, but little is known about what happens to attention after perception of the attended object is complete. One possibility is that the focus of attention passively fades. A second possibility is that attention is actively terminated after the completion of perception so that the brain can be prepared for the next target. The present study investigated this issue with event-related potentials in humans, focusing on the N2pc component (a neural measure of attentional deployment) and the Pd component (a neural measure of attentional suppression). We found that active suppression occurred both to prevent the allocation of attention to known distractors and to terminate attention after the perception of an attended object was complete. In addition, the neural measure of active suppression was correlated with a behavioral measure of trial-to-trial variations in the allocation of attention. Active suppression therefore appears to be a general-purpose mechanism that both prevents and terminates the allocation of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22855820      PMCID: PMC3488698          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1864-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  75 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks.

Authors:  Nicholas E DiQuattro; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Nicholas E Diquattro
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception.

Authors:  Jens-Max Hopf; Steven J Luck; Kai Boelmans; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Carsten N Boehler; Jochem Rieger; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components.

Authors:  S J Luck; H J Heinze; G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-06

6.  Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Anna Grubert; Anders Petersen; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans.

Authors:  Jens-Max Hopf; Kai Boelmans; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld; Steven J Luck; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  65 in total

1.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Properties of neuronal facilitation that improve target tracking in natural pursuit simulations.

Authors:  Zahra M Bagheri; Steven D Wiederman; Benjamin S Cazzolato; Steven Grainger; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Anticipatory alpha oscillation predicts attentional selection and hemodynamic response.

Authors:  Chenguang Zhao; Jialiang Guo; Dongwei Li; Ye Tao; Yulong Ding; Hanli Liu; Yan Song
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ayala S Allon; Gili Vixman; Roy Luria
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-29

7.  Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Authors:  Caroline Max; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.

Authors:  David R Painter; Paul E Dux; Susan L Travis; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Rapid feature-driven changes in the attentional window.

Authors:  Carly J Leonard; Javier Lopez-Calderon; Johanna Kreither; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.