Literature DB >> 24573295

Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.

David R Painter1, Paul E Dux, Susan L Travis, Jason B Mattingley.   

Abstract

The visual world is typically too complex to permit full apprehension of its content from a single fixation. Humans therefore use visual search to direct attention and eye movements to locations or objects of interest in cluttered scenes. Psychophysical investigations have revealed that observers can select target elements from within an array of distractors on the basis of their spatial location or simple features, such as color. It remains unclear, however, how stimuli that lie outside the current search array are represented in the visual system. To investigate this, we recorded continuous neural activity using EEG while participants searched a foveal array of colored targets and distractors, and ignored irrelevant objects in the periphery. Search targets were defined either by a unique feature within the array or by a conjunction of features. Objects outside the array could match the target or distractor color within the array, or otherwise possessed a baseline (neutral) color present only in the periphery. The search array and irrelevant peripheral objects flickered at unique rates and thus evoked distinct frequency-tagged neural oscillations. During conjunction but not unique-feature search, target-colored objects outside the array evoked enhanced activity relative to distractor-colored and neutral objects. The results suggest that feature-based selection applies to stimuli at ignored peripheral locations, but only when central targets compete with distractors within the array. Distractor-colored and neutral objects evoked equivalent oscillatory responses, suggesting that feature-based selection at ignored locations during visual search arises exclusively from enhancement rather than suppression of neural activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feature-based attention; frequency tagging; neural oscillations; steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP); visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24573295      PMCID: PMC6795312          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3630-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  55 in total

1.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Visual search strategies are indexed by event-related lateralizations of the EEG.

Authors:  Maren Wolber; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Andrew B Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

5.  Temporal variability of the N2pc during efficient and inefficient visual search.

Authors:  Jarrod R Dowdall; Artur Luczak; Matthew S Tata
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Basing perceptual decisions on the most informative sensory neurons.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yee Joon Kim; Marcia Grabowecky; Ken A Paller; Krishnakumar Muthu; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-17       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M I Sereno; A M Dale; J B Reppas; K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  15 in total

1.  Attending to What and Where: Background Connectivity Integrates Categorical and Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Alexa Tompary; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Feature-based attention is not confined by object boundaries: Spatially global enhancement of irrelevant features.

Authors:  Angus F Chapman; Viola S Störmer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Bo Hong; Shangkai Gao; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Is feature-based attention always spatially global during visual search?

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; Kirsten C S Adam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Optimising the classification of feature-based attention in frequency-tagged electroencephalography data.

Authors:  Angela I Renton; David R Painter; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 8.501

7.  Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.

Authors:  Katharine Molloy; Timothy D Griffiths; Maria Chait; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Implicit Neurofeedback Training of Feature-Based Attention Promotes Biased Sensory Processing during Integrative Decision-Making.

Authors:  Angela I Renton; David R Painter; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features.

Authors:  Søren K Andersen; Matthias M Müller; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling.

Authors:  David R Painter; Jeffrey J Kim; Angela I Renton; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.