Literature DB >> 29845437

Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.

Ayala S Allon1,2, Gili Vixman3, Roy Luria3,4.   

Abstract

As part of filtering irrelevant information from entering visual working memory (VWM) and selecting only the relevant information for further processing the system should first tag the pieces of information as relevant or irrelevant. We manipulated difficulty of tagging items as relevant or irrelevant by applying perceptual grouping cues to investigate if it can improve filtering performance in VWM. Participants performed a change-detection task with three targets, six targets, or three targets and three distractors (filtering condition) in the memory display, and were asked to remember the colors (Experiments 1-2) or the orientations (Experiments 3-5) of the targets and ignore the distractors. In the filtering conditions, either the targets (Experiments 1, 3, and 4) or the distractors (Experiments 2 and 5) formed an illusory object (a Kanizsa triangle), appeared in a triangle-like configuration (grouping by proximity), or appeared at random positions (non-grouping). Grouping the targets improved filtering performance relative to non-grouping. Moreover, the illusory object cue further improved filtering performance beyond a proximity cue, but only when the cue was compatible with the task. When the distractors were grouped, the proximity cue improved filtering performance, and the illusory object cue, despite being a potent grouping cue, failed to improve filtering performance when it was compatible with the task. We suggest that the grouping cues advanced tagging of the grouped items. Yet, when the grouping cue strongly enhanced processing of the distractors, the tagging failed, such that the preliminary process of estimating incoming items led to full processing of the grouped items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29845437     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1032-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  75 in total

1.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Andrew B Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

2.  Organization principles in visual working memory: Evidence from sequential stimulus display.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Qiyang Gao; Ning Tang; Rende Shui; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-11-09

3.  Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward Vogel; Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Contralateral delay activity tracks object identity information in visual short term memory.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Xiaotian Xu; Zhibo Chen; Jun Yin; Mowei Shen; Rende Shui
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Rasa Gulbinaite; Addie Johnson; Ritske de Jong; Candice C Morey; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Working memory for visual features and conjunctions in schizophrenia.

Authors:  James M Gold; Christopher M Wilk; Robert P McMahon; Robert W Buchanan; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2003-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Concrete mindset impairs filtering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Britt Hadar; Roy Luria; Nira Liberman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

2.  Evidence for the beneficial effect of perceptual grouping on visual working memory: an empirical study on illusory contour and a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Jiaofeng Li; Jiehui Qian; Fan Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Emergent Engram: A Historical Legacy and Contemporary Discovery.

Authors:  Bryan D Devan; Kyle Berger; Robert J McDonald
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Encoding specificity instead of online integration of real-world spatial regularities for objects in working memory.

Authors:  Xinyang Liu; Ruyi Liu; Lijing Guo; Piia Astikainen; Chaoxiong Ye
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Does perceptual grouping improve visuospatial working memory? Optimized processing or encoding bias.

Authors:  Antonio Prieto; Vanesa Peinado; Julia Mayas
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.