Literature DB >> 26386396

Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Caroline Max1, Andreas Widmann1, Erich Schröger1, Elyse Sussman2.   

Abstract

This study tested effects of task requirements and knowledge on auditory distraction effects. This was done by comparing the response to a pitch change (an irrelevant, distracting tone feature) that occurred predictably in a tone sequence (every 5th tone) under different task conditions. The same regular sound sequence was presented with task conditions varying in what information the participant was given about the predictability of the pitch change, and when this information was relevant for the task to be performed. In all conditions, participants performed a tone duration judgment task. Behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures were obtained to measure distraction effects and deviance detection. Predictable deviants produced behavioral distraction effects in all conditions. However, the P3a amplitude evoked by the predictable pitch change was largest when participants were uninformed about the regular structure of the sound sequence, showing an effect of knowledge on involuntary orienting of attention. In contrast, the mismatch negativity (MMN) component was only modulated when the regularity was relevant for the task and not by stimulus predictability itself. P3a and behavioral indices of distraction were not fully concordant. Overall, our results show differential effects of knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction effects indexed by neurophysiological (P3a) and behavioral measures.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Distraction; Explicit knowledge; Implicit knowledge; Mismatch negativity (MMN); P3a; Predictability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386396      PMCID: PMC4658268          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  30 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

3.  Organization of sequential sounds in auditory memory.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman; Valentina Gumenyuk
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants.

Authors:  Sylvia Jankowiak; Stefan Berti
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Knowledge of sequence structure prevents auditory distraction: an ERP study.

Authors:  Márta Volosin; János Horváth
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Top-down effects can modify the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization.

Authors:  Elyse Sussman; István Winkler; Minna Huotilainen; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-05

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  The development of the perceptual organization of sound by frequency separation in 5-11-year-old children.

Authors:  E Sussman; R Wong; J Horváth; I Winkler; W Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cognitive control of involuntary attention and distraction in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Attention Matters: Pitch vs. Pattern Processing in Adolescence.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.

Authors:  Álvaro Darriba; Yi-Fang Hsu; Sandrien Van Ommen; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Limited Evidence for Sensory Prediction Error Responses in Visual Cortex of Macaques and Humans.

Authors:  Selina S Solomon; Huizhen Tang; Elyse Sussman; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Minimal interplay between explicit knowledge, dynamics of learning and temporal expectations in different, complex uni- and multisensory contexts.

Authors:  Felix Ball; Inga Spuerck; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.