Literature DB >> 22848204

Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements.

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte1, Marieke Mur.   

Abstract

The pairwise dissimilarities of a set of items can be intuitively visualized by a 2D arrangement of the items, in which the distances reflect the dissimilarities. Such an arrangement can be obtained by multidimensional scaling (MDS). We propose a method for the inverse process: inferring the pairwise dissimilarities from multiple 2D arrangements of items. Perceptual dissimilarities are classically measured using pairwise dissimilarity judgments. However, alternative methods including free sorting and 2D arrangements have previously been proposed. The present proposal is novel (a) in that the dissimilarity matrix is estimated by "inverse MDS" based on multiple arrangements of item subsets, and (b) in that the subsets are designed by an adaptive algorithm that aims to provide optimal evidence for the dissimilarity estimates. The subject arranges the items (represented as icons on a computer screen) by means of mouse drag-and-drop operations. The multi-arrangement method can be construed as a generalization of simpler methods: It reduces to pairwise dissimilarity judgments if each arrangement contains only two items, and to free sorting if the items are categorically arranged into discrete piles. Multi-arrangement combines the advantages of these methods. It is efficient (because the subject communicates many dissimilarity judgments with each mouse drag), psychologically attractive (because dissimilarities are judged in context), and can characterize continuous high-dimensional dissimilarity structures. We present two procedures for estimating the dissimilarity matrix: a simple weighted-aligned-average of the partial dissimilarity matrices and a computationally intensive algorithm, which estimates the dissimilarity matrix by iteratively minimizing the error of MDS-predictions of the subject's arrangements. The Matlab code for interactive arrangement and dissimilarity estimation is available from the authors upon request.

Entities:  

Keywords:  multidimensional scaling; representation; representational similarity analysis; similarity; similarity judgment

Year:  2012        PMID: 22848204      PMCID: PMC3404552          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  10 in total

Review 1.  Representation is representation of similarities.

Authors:  S Edelman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition.

Authors:  James L McClelland; Timothy T Rogers
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Stimulus and response generalization: tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.

Authors:  R N SHEPARD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-06

4.  Perceptual similarity of shapes generated from Fourier descriptors.

Authors:  J M Cortese; B P Dyre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Similarity in context.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; D L Medin; J Halberstadt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-03

6.  Multidimensional scaling of similarity.

Authors:  W S Torgerson
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Similarity After Goodman.

Authors:  Lieven Decock; Igor Douven
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2010-06-26

9.  Matching categorical object representations in inferior temporal cortex of man and monkey.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Douglas A Ruff; Roozbeh Kiani; Jerzy Bodurka; Hossein Esteky; Keiji Tanaka; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-24
  10 in total
  50 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  To What Extent Does Global Shape Influence Category Representation in the Brain?

Authors:  N Apurva Ratan Murty; R T Pramod
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Collective memory shapes the organization of individual memories in the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Pierre Gagnepain; Thomas Vallée; Serge Heiden; Matthieu Decorde; Jean-Luc Gauvain; Antoine Laurent; Carine Klein-Peschanski; Fausto Viader; Denis Peschanski; Francis Eustache
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-12-16

4.  The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Stefania Bracci; J Brendan Ritchie; Ioannis Kalfas; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spatiotemporal properties of the neural representation of conceptual content for words and pictures - an MEG study.

Authors:  Giuliano Giari; Elisa Leonardelli; Yuan Tao; Mayara Machado; Scott L Fairhall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Similarity judgments and cortical visual responses reflect different properties of object and scene categories in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Marcie L King; Iris I A Groen; Adam Steel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Non-Bayesian noun generalization in 3- to 5-year-old children: probing the role of prior knowledge in the suspicious coincidence effect.

Authors:  Gavin W Jenkins; Larissa K Samuelson; Jodi R Smith; John P Spencer
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-24

Review 9.  Multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-10-08

10.  Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.

Authors:  Jeongmi Lee; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.