Literature DB >> 31054350

Similarity judgments and cortical visual responses reflect different properties of object and scene categories in naturalistic images.

Marcie L King1, Iris I A Groen2, Adam Steel3, Dwight J Kravitz4, Chris I Baker5.   

Abstract

Numerous factors have been reported to underlie the representation of complex images in high-level human visual cortex, including categories (e.g. faces, objects, scenes), animacy, and real-world size, but the extent to which this organization reflects behavioral judgments of real-world stimuli is unclear. Here, we compared representations derived from explicit behavioral similarity judgments and ultra-high field (7T) fMRI of human visual cortex for multiple exemplars of a diverse set of naturalistic images from 48 object and scene categories. While there was a significant correlation between similarity judgments and fMRI responses, there were striking differences between the two representational spaces. Behavioral judgements primarily revealed a coarse division between man-made (including humans) and natural (including animals) images, with clear groupings of conceptually-related categories (e.g. transportation, animals), while these conceptual groupings were largely absent in the fMRI representations. Instead, fMRI responses primarily seemed to reflect a separation of both human and non-human faces/bodies from all other categories. Further, comparison of the behavioral and fMRI representational spaces with those derived from the layers of a deep neural network (DNN) showed a strong correspondence with behavior in the top-most layer and with fMRI in the mid-level layers. These results suggest a complex relationship between localized responses in high-level visual cortex and behavioral similarity judgments - each domain reflects different properties of the images, and responses in high-level visual cortex may correspond to intermediate stages of processing between basic visual features and the conceptual categories that dominate the behavioral response. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31054350      PMCID: PMC6591094          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  70 in total

1.  Large-scale mirror-symmetry organization of human occipito-temporal object areas.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Michal Harel; Ifat Levy; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L K Yamins; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  GRAPES-Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain.

Authors:  Alex Martin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

4.  The representation of biological classes in the human brain.

Authors:  Andrew C Connolly; J Swaroop Guntupalli; Jason Gors; Michael Hanke; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Yu-Chien Wu; Hervé Abdi; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain.

Authors:  Alexander G Huth; Shinji Nishimoto; An T Vu; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Discrimination of Visual Categories Based on Behavioral Relevance in Widespread Regions of Frontoparietal Cortex.

Authors:  Yaara Erez; John Duncan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Scene-Selectivity and Retinotopy in Medial Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Edward H Silson; Adam D Steel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Human Object-Similarity Judgments Reflect and Transcend the Primate-IT Object Representation.

Authors:  Marieke Mur; Mirjam Meys; Jerzy Bodurka; Rainer Goebel; Peter A Bandettini; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-22

10.  Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space.

Authors:  Cara E Van Uden; Samuel A Nastase; Andrew C Connolly; Ma Feilong; Isabella Hansen; M Ida Gobbini; James V Haxby
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  8 in total

1.  Categorical representation from sound and sight in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex of sighted and blind.

Authors:  Stefania Mattioni; Mohamed Rezk; Ceren Battal; Roberto Bottini; Karen E Cuculiza Mendoza; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  The contribution of object identity and configuration to scene representation in convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Kevin Tang; Matthew Chin; Marvin Chun; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Standardized database of 400 complex abstract fractals.

Authors:  Rebecca Ovalle-Fresa; Sarah V Di Pietro; Thomas P Reber; Eleonora Balbi; Nicolas Rothen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 4.  The Emotional Facet of Subjective and Neural Indices of Similarity.

Authors:  Martina Riberto; Gorana Pobric; Deborah Talmi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  DNNBrain: A Unifying Toolbox for Mapping Deep Neural Networks and Brains.

Authors:  Xiayu Chen; Ming Zhou; Zhengxin Gong; Wei Xu; Xingyu Liu; Taicheng Huang; Zonglei Zhen; Jia Liu
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Limits to visual representational correspondence between convolutional neural networks and the human brain.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Hierarchical Sparse Coding of Objects in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Xingyu Liu; Zonglei Zhen; Jia Liu
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  General object-based features account for letter perception.

Authors:  Daniel Janini; Chris Hamblin; Arturo Deza; Talia Konkle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.779

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.