Literature DB >> 31196934

The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks.

Stefania Bracci1, J Brendan Ritchie2, Ioannis Kalfas3, Hans P Op de Beeck2.   

Abstract

Recent studies showed agreement between how the human brain and neural networks represent objects, suggesting that we might start to understand the underlying computations. However, we know that the human brain is prone to biases at many perceptual and cognitive levels, often shaped by learning history and evolutionary constraints. Here, we explore one such perceptual phenomenon, perceiving animacy, and use the performance of neural networks as a benchmark. We performed an fMRI study that dissociated object appearance (what an object looks like) from object category (animate or inanimate) by constructing a stimulus set that includes animate objects (e.g., a cow), typical inanimate objects (e.g., a mug), and, crucially, inanimate objects that look like the animate objects (e.g., a cow mug). Behavioral judgments and deep neural networks categorized images mainly by animacy, setting all objects (lookalike and inanimate) apart from the animate ones. In contrast, activity patterns in ventral occipitotemporal cortex (VTC) were better explained by object appearance: animals and lookalikes were similarly represented and separated from the inanimate objects. Furthermore, the appearance of an object interfered with proper object identification, such as failing to signal that a cow mug is a mug. The preference in VTC to represent a lookalike as animate was even present when participants performed a task requiring them to report the lookalikes as inanimate. In conclusion, VTC representations, in contrast to neural networks, fail to represent objects when visual appearance is dissociated from animacy, probably due to a preferred processing of visual features typical of animate objects.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How does the brain represent objects that we perceive around us? Recent advances in artificial intelligence have suggested that object categorization and its neural correlates have now been approximated by neural networks. Here, we show that neural networks can predict animacy according to human behavior but do not explain visual cortex representations. In ventral occipitotemporal cortex, neural activity patterns were strongly biased toward object appearance, to the extent that objects with visual features resembling animals were represented closely to real animals and separated from other objects from the same category. This organization that privileges animals and their features over objects might be the result of learning history and evolutionary constraints.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; animacy; deep neural networks; fMRI; object representations; occipitotemporal cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31196934      PMCID: PMC6697402          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1714-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  56 in total

1.  Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; T Kushnir; S Edelman; G Avidan; Y Itzchak; R Malach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object.

Authors:  P D Tremoulet; J Feldman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Information-based functional brain mapping.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Rainer Goebel; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Sabin Dang; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body.

Authors:  P E Downing; Y Jiang; M Shuman; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Katrien Torfs; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Matching categorical object representations in inferior temporal cortex of man and monkey.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Douglas A Ruff; Roozbeh Kiani; Jerzy Bodurka; Hossein Esteky; Keiji Tanaka; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.

Authors:  Joshua New; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-24
View more
  12 in total

1.  Categorical representation from sound and sight in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex of sighted and blind.

Authors:  Stefania Mattioni; Mohamed Rezk; Ceren Battal; Roberto Bottini; Karen E Cuculiza Mendoza; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Similarity judgments and cortical visual responses reflect different properties of object and scene categories in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Marcie L King; Iris I A Groen; Adam Steel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Ultra-high-resolution fMRI of Human Ventral Temporal Cortex Reveals Differential Representation of Categories and Domains.

Authors:  Eshed Margalit; Keith W Jamison; Kevin S Weiner; Luca Vizioli; Ru-Yuan Zhang; Kendrick N Kay; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Face neurons encode nonsemantic features.

Authors:  Alexandra Bardon; Will Xiao; Carlos R Ponce; Margaret S Livingstone; Gabriel Kreiman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Roles of Category, Shape, and Spatial Frequency in Shaping Animal and Tool Selectivity in the Occipitotemporal Cortex.

Authors:  Chenxi He; Shao-Chin Hung; Olivia S Cheung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Limits to visual representational correspondence between convolutional neural networks and the human brain.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Using deep neural networks to evaluate object vision tasks in rats.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Hans Op de Beeck
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Visual prototypes in the ventral stream are attuned to complexity and gaze behavior.

Authors:  Olivia Rose; James Johnson; Binxu Wang; Carlos R Ponce
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Untangling the Animacy Organization of Occipitotemporal Cortex.

Authors:  J Brendan Ritchie; Astrid A Zeman; Joyce Bosmans; Shuo Sun; Kirsten Verhaegen; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Topography of Visual Features in the Human Ventral Visual Pathway.

Authors:  Shijia Fan; Xiaosha Wang; Xiaoying Wang; Tao Wei; Yanchao Bi
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.