Literature DB >> 22841571

Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.

Christophe Micheyl1, Li Xiao, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the difference limen for frequency (DLF) of pure tones and three commonly explored stimulus parameters of frequency, duration, and sensation level. Data from 12 published studies of pure-tone frequency discrimination (a total of 583 DLF measurements across 77 normal-hearing listeners) were analyzed using hierarchical (or "mixed-effects") generalized linear models. Model parameters were estimated using two approaches (Bayesian and maximum likelihood). A model in which log-transformed DLFs were predicted using a sum of power-law functions plus a random subject- or group-specific term was found to explain a substantial proportion of the variability in the psychophysical data. The results confirmed earlier findings of an inverse-square-root relationship between log-transformed DLFs and duration, and of an inverse relationship between log(DLF) and sensation level. However, they did not confirm earlier suggestions that log(DLF) increases approximately linearly with the square-root of frequency; instead, the relationship between frequency and log(DLF) was best fitted using a power function of frequency with an exponent of about 0.8. These results, and the comprehensive quantitative analysis of pure-tone frequency discrimination on which they are based, provide a new reference for the quantitative evaluation of models of frequency (or pitch) discrimination.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22841571      PMCID: PMC3455123          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  33 in total

1.  A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave enlargement effect.

Authors:  M F McKinney; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

4.  Psychometric functions for pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency discrimination as a function of tonal duration and excitation-pattern slopes in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R L Freyman; D A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some effects of bandwith-duration constraints on frequency discrimination.

Authors:  D A Ronken
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; C C Wier; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequency discrimination at 1200 Hz in the presence of high-frequency masking noise.

Authors:  D A Nelson; M E Stanton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Frequency discrimination of short- versus long-duration tones by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R L Freyman; D A Nelson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-03
View more
  21 in total

1.  Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Implications of within-fiber temporal coding for perceptual studies of F0 discrimination and discrimination of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Christophe Micheyl; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

3.  Auditory deficits in amusia extend beyond poor pitch perception.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Oscillatory Entrainment of the Frequency-following Response in Auditory Cortical and Subcortical Structures.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Isabelle Arseneau-Bruneau; Xiaochen Zhang; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The role of efferents in human auditory development: efferent inhibition predicts frequency discrimination in noise for children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  An Active Sensing Paradigm for Studying Human Auditory Perception.

Authors:  Dardo N Ferreiro; Valentin R Winhart; Benedikt Grothe; Bahador Bahrami; Michael Pecka
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18

9.  Factors affecting sensitivity to frequency change in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Crystal N Taylor; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Gradual decay and sudden death of short-term memory for pitch.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Leonard Varghese; Christophe Micheyl; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.