Literature DB >> 10573885

A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave enlargement effect.

M F McKinney1, B Delgutte.   

Abstract

Although the physical octave is defined as a simple ratio of 2:1, listeners prefer slightly greater octave ratios. Ohgushi [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 1694-1700 (1983)] suggested that a temporal model for octave matching would predict this octave enlargement effect because, in response to pure tones, auditory-nerve interspike intervals are slightly larger than the stimulus period. In an effort to test Ohgushi's hypothesis, auditory-nerve single-unit responses to pure-tone stimuli were collected from Dial-anesthetized cats. It was found that although interspike interval distributions show clear phase-locking to the stimulus, intervals systematically deviate from integer multiples of the stimulus period. Due to refractory effects, intervals smaller than 5 msec are slightly larger than the stimulus period and deviate most for small intervals. On the other hand, first-order intervals are smaller than the stimulus period for stimulus frequencies less than 500 Hz. It is shown that this deviation is the combined effect of phase-locking and multiple spikes within one stimulus period. A model for octave matching was implemented which compares frequency estimates of two tones based on their interspike interval distributions. The model quantitatively predicts the octave enlargement effect. These results are consistent with the idea that musical pitch is derived from auditory-nerve interspike interval distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573885      PMCID: PMC2346780          DOI: 10.1121/1.428098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  A duplex theory of pitch perception.

Authors:  J C R LICKLIDER
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1951-04-15

2.  Pitch characteristics of short tones; two kinds of pitch threshold.

Authors:  J M DOUGHTY; W R GARNER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1947-08

3.  Curious oddments of auditory-nerve studies.

Authors:  N Y Kiang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Response to noise of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Musical octaves and pitch.

Authors:  J E Sundberg; J Lindqvist
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon; R A Levine
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1970

9.  Response of cochlear nerve fibers to brief acoustic stimuli: role of discharge-history effects.

Authors:  R P Gaumond; D O Kim; C E Molnar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  On the role of spatial and temporal cues in the perception of the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  K Ohgushi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Psychometric functions for pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modeling binaural responses in the auditory brainstem to electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-28

5.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Li Xiao; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Behavioral and physiological correlates of temporal pitch perception in electric and acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Suresh Mahendran; John M Deeks; Christopher J Long; Patrick Axon; David Baguley; Stefan Bleeck; Ian M Winter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory discrimination of frequency ratios: the octave singularity.

Authors:  Damien Bonnard; Christophe Micheyl; Catherine Semal; René Dauman; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The 1.06 frequency ratio in the cochlea: evidence and outlook for a natural musical semitone.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; W Wiktor Jedrzejczak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.