Literature DB >> 22821348

Discordance in TKA expectations between patients and surgeons.

Hassan M K Ghomrawi1, Carol A Mancuso, Geoffrey H Westrich, Robert G Marx, Alvin I Mushlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aligning patient and surgeon expectations preoperatively may lead to better postoperative medical and rehabilitation compliance and therefore improve outcomes and increase satisfaction. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) determined the rate of discordantly high patient expectations compared with those of their surgeon in patients undergoing TKA; and (2) evaluated the impact of the preoperative educational class, patient characteristics, and functional status on the likelihood of having discordantly high patient expectations.
METHODS: We enrolled 205 patients awaiting TKA. Each patient completed a validated questionnaire that addresses expectations of postoperative pain relief, function, and well-being as part of a preoperative assessment. The surgeon completed the same expectations questionnaire preoperatively blinded to their patient's response. Patients had discordantly high expectations if their scores were ≥ 7 points higher than the surgeon on a 0 to 100 score range. Regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of class, patient characteristics, and functional status on the likelihood of having discordantly high patient expectations.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of the patients had expectation scores ≥ 7 points higher than those of their surgeon. Patients were less likely to have discordantly higher expectations if they were female (OR, 0.56; CI, 0.32-0.97) and if their pain level was high (OR, 0.99; CI, 0.98-0.99). Patients were more likely to have discordantly higher expectations if they filled out the expectations survey before rather than after the preoperative educational class (OR, 1.80; CI, 1.08-3.01).
CONCLUSIONS: With increasing TKA use, surgeons will likely encounter more patients with discordantly high expectations. The preoperative educational class can be used to target patients more likely to have discordantly high expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22821348      PMCID: PMC3528944          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2484-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations.

Authors:  Natalia A Wilson; Eugene S Schneller; Kathleen Montgomery; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  How Often are Patient and Surgeon Recovery Expectations for Total Joint Arthroplasty Aligned? Results of a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Nuria Franco Ferrando; Lisa A Mandl; Huong Do; Neaz Noor; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-06-25

4.  The WOMAC Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN Hand Osteoarthritis Indices.

Authors:  N Bellamy
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.473

5.  Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery.

Authors:  E W Karlson; L H Daltroy; M H Liang; H E Eaton; J N Katz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Patients' expectations of knee surgery.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; T P Sculco; T L Wickiewicz; E C Jones; L Robbins; R F Warren; P Williams-Russo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  In-hospital complications and mortality of unilateral, bilateral, and revision TKA: based on an estimate of 4,159,661 discharges.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Alejandro González Della Valle; Melanie C Besculides; Licia Gaber; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; Suzanne Graziano; Lisa M Briskie; Margaret G E Peterson; Paul M Pellicci; Eduardo A Salvati; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; Sören Toksvig-Larsen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-05-25       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  [Joint replacement in the elderly].

Authors:  C Baier; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; G Maderbacher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Personality and comorbidity: are there "difficult patients" in hip arthroplasty?].

Authors:  K-P Günther; E Haase; T Lange; C Kopkow; J Schmitt; C Jeszenszky; F Balck; J Lützner; A Hartmann; M Lippmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing discrepancy between patients' pre-surgery expectations and abilities and post-surgical outcomes following knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Neil T Diamond; Hylton B Menz; Elin Wee; Soula Margelis; Andrew G Stewart; John R Bartlett; Neil B Bergman; Stephen McMahon; David L Hare; Keith Hill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Do Surgeon Expectations Predict Clinically Important Improvements in WOMAC Scores After THA and TKA?

Authors:  Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Carol A Mancuso; Allison Dunning; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; Michael Alexiades; Charles Cornell; Thomas Sculco; Matthias Bostrom; David Mayman; Robert G Marx; Geoffrey Westrich; Michael O'Dell; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Poor expectations of knee replacement benefit are associated with modifiable psychological factors and influence the decision to have surgery: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of a community-based sample.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Gregory J Golladay; Amanda Hayes; Hassan M K Ghomrawi
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction With Care and Surgical Outcomes for Total Hip and Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Margaret C Wang; Priscilla H Chan; Elizabeth W Paxton; Jim Bellows; Kate Koplan; Violeta Rabrenovich; Jeff Convissar; Nithin C Reddy; Christopher D Grimsrud; Ronald A Navarro
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-11-03

7.  Eliciting Activity Goals With a Self-Administered Survey Among Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Mark Alan Fontana; Wasif Islam; Michelle A Richardson; Michael L Parks; David J Mayman; Catherine H MacLean
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2022-04-11

8.  Modified Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log (mOPTIMAL): A Responsive and Reliable Tool for Patients with Non-Operative Shoulder Pain.

Authors:  Michael A Shaffer; Lisabeth L Kestel; Brian R Wolf; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

9.  What do we mean when we say an operation works?

Authors:  Richard Villar
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

10.  Association Between Baseline PROMIS Scores, Patient-Provider Communication Factors, and Musculoskeletal Health Literacy on Patient and Surgeon Expectations in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Authors:  Aoife MacMahon; Elizabeth A Cody; Kristin Caolo; Jensen K Henry; Mark C Drakos; Constantine A Demetracopoulos; Aleksander Savenkov; Scott J Ellis
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.