Literature DB >> 18997215

Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations.

Natalia A Wilson1, Eugene S Schneller, Kathleen Montgomery, Kevin J Bozic.   

Abstract

This paper constitutes an analysis of the issues, relationships, emerging hospital strategies, and policy needs surrounding hip and knee implants. Demand for hip and knee replacements is rising annually, and growth is expected to be substantial. Costs are high, reaching $11 billion for hospitals in 2004 and $5 billion for Medicare in 2006. Relationships among stakeholders add complexity. Case studies reveal emerging strategies by hospitals for management of implants. Policy considerations include development of a national council for data and technology assessment, a national joint registry, price transparency, and incentives.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997215     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  30 in total

1.  Value-based purchasing of medical devices.

Authors:  William T Obremskey; Teresa Dail; A Alex Jahangir
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Using financial incentives to improve value in orthopaedics.

Authors:  David Lansky; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Professionalism in 21st century professional practice: autonomy and accountability in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Eugene S Schneller; Natalia A Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Prometheus payment model: application to hip and knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Amita Rastogi; Beth A Mohr; Jeffery O Williams; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; Francois de Brantes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What Factors are Associated With 90-day Episode-of-care Payments for Younger Patients With Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Shweta Pathak; Cecilia M Ganduglia; Samir S Awad; Wenyaw Chan; John M Swint; Robert O Morgan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Assessing the value of a total joint replacement.

Authors:  David B Bumpass; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-12

7.  Knee replacement and Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries.

Authors:  Siok Swan Tan; Pietro Chiarello; Wilm Quentin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Determining who should be referred for total hip and knee replacements.

Authors:  Lisa A Mandl
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  How Often are Patient and Surgeon Recovery Expectations for Total Joint Arthroplasty Aligned? Results of a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Nuria Franco Ferrando; Lisa A Mandl; Huong Do; Neaz Noor; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-06-25

10.  Real-time synchronous measurement of curing characteristics and polymerization stress in bone cements with a cantilever-beam based instrument.

Authors:  Sri Vikram Palagummi; Forrest A Landis; Martin Y M Chiang
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.