Literature DB >> 11451969

Patients' expectations of knee surgery.

C A Mancuso1, T P Sculco, T L Wickiewicz, E C Jones, L Robbins, R F Warren, P Williams-Russo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients' expectations of medical care are linked to their requests for treatment and to their assessments of outcome and satisfaction. Our goals were to measure patients" preoperative expectations of knee surgery and to develop and test patient-derived knee expectations surveys.
METHODS: An initial sample of 377 patients (mean age, 54.6 18.2 years; 52% women) was enrolled in the survey-development phase. One hundred and sixty-one (43%) of these patients subsequently underwent total knee arthroplasty; seventy-five (20%), cruciate ligament repair; eighty-five (23%), meniscal surgery; and fifty-six (15%), surgery for another knee condition. Preoperatively, these patients were asked open-ended questions about their expectations of knee surgery. Their responses were grouped with use of qualitative research techniques to generate categories of expectations. Categories were transformed into specific questions and were formatted into two draft surveys, one for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty and one for patients undergoing other surgical procedures on the knee. A second sample of 163 patients (mean age, 55.1 17.5 years; 49% women) was enrolled in the survey-testing phase, and they completed the draft surveys on two separate occasions to establish test-retest reliability. Items were selected for the final surveys if they were cited by 5% of the patients, if they represented important functional changes resulting from surgery, or if they represented potentially unrealistic expectations. All selected items fulfilled reliability criteria, defined as a kappa (or weighted kappa) value of 0.4, or were deemed to be clinically relevant by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons.
RESULTS: From the survey-development phase, a total of fifty-two categories of expectations were discerned; they included both anticipated items such as pain relief and improvement in walking ability and unanticipated items such as improving psychological well-being. Expectations varied by diagnosis and patient characteristics, including functional status. Two final surveys were generated: the seventeen-item Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectations Survey and the twenty-item Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Surgery Expectations Survey. Each required less than five minutes to complete.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients have multiple expectations of knee surgery in the areas of symptom relief and improvement of physical and psychosocial function, and these expectations vary according to the diagnosis. We developed two valid and reliable surveys that can be used preoperatively to direct patient education and shared decision-making and to provide a framework for setting reasonable goals. Reexamining patients' responses postoperatively could provide a way to assess fulfillment of expectations, which is a crucial patient-derived measure of outcome and satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451969     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200107000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  111 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness research: a cornerstone of healthcare reform?

Authors:  Alvin I Mushlin; Hassan M K Ghomrawi
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2010

2.  Patient expectations of hip and knee joint replacement surgery and postoperative health status.

Authors:  Marita Cross; Helen Lapsley; Annica Barcenilla; David Parker; Myles Coolican; Lyn March
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Development of a new Knee Society scoring system.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Giles R Scuderi; Adam C Brekke; Alla Sikorskii; James B Benjamin; Jess H Lonner; Priya Chadha; Daniel A Daylamani; W Norman Scott; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Measuring the utility of incontinence care seeking.

Authors:  Michael Heit; Linda Blackwell; Susan Kelly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-06-20

5.  Disparities in TKA Outcomes: Census Tract Data Show Interactions Between Race and Poverty.

Authors:  Susan M Goodman; Lisa A Mandl; Michael L Parks; Meng Zhang; Kelly R McHugh; Yuo-Yu Lee; Joseph T Nguyen; Linda A Russell; Margaret H Bogardus; Mark P Figgie; Anne R Bass
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy in post-operative recovery and participation in recreational and sports activities.

Authors:  Man Soo Kim; In Jun Koh; Sueen Sohn; Ji Hwan Jeong; Yong In
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  High-flexion total knee replacement: functional outcome at one year.

Authors:  Matthew S Hepinstall; Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-01-29

8.  Willingness and access to joint replacement among African American patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled intervention.

Authors:  Said A Ibrahim; Barbara H Hanusa; Michael J Hannon; Denise Kresevic; Judith Long; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-05

9.  No differences in functional results and quality of life after single-radius or multiradius TKA.

Authors:  Pedro Hinarejos; Lluis Puig-Verdie; Joan Leal; Xavier Pelfort; Raul Torres-Claramunt; Juan Sánchez-Soler; Joan C Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Maximum recovery after knee replacement--the MARKER study rationale and protocol.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Lyn March; Jack Crosbie; Ross Crawford; Stephen Graves; Justine Naylor; Alison Harmer; Stephen Jan; Kim Bennell; Ian Harris; David Parker; Helene Moffet; Marlene Fransen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.