Literature DB >> 18196427

Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties.

Carol A Mancuso1, Suzanne Graziano, Lisa M Briskie, Margaret G E Peterson, Paul M Pellicci, Eduardo A Salvati, Thomas P Sculco.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Patients have multiple expectations of THA and TKA. We asked whether preoperative educational classes addressing recovery during the first year could modify patients' expectations of their 12-month postoperative recovery. Participants were enrolled consecutively in two randomized, controlled trials, one for THA (177 patients) and one for TKA (143 patients). Control patients preoperatively received a standard THA or TKA class addressing recovery immediately after surgery. Intervention patients preoperatively received the standard class plus a joint-specific module addressing recovery during the first 12 months. Before and after the class, patients completed either a hip-specific or knee-specific validated expectations survey. The main outcome was the within-patient change in expectation scores (maximum increase, +100; maximum decrease, -100) before and after the class but preoperatively. Mean changes in hip scores were +3.3+/-8 for intervention patients (range, -22+/-32) and +4.9+/-8 for control patients (range, -13+/-29). Mean changes in knee scores were -3.4+/-10 for intervention patients (range, -26+/-33) and +2.4+/-10 for control patients (range, -30+/-30). Patients' preoperative expectations of their recovery from THA or TKA can be modified by preoperative educational classes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196427      PMCID: PMC2505138          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0052-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Patients' expectations of shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; David W Altchek; Edward V Craig; Edward C Jones; Laura Robbins; Russell F Warren; Pamela Williams-Russo
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica.

Authors:  G K Lutz; M E Butzlaff; S J Atlas; R B Keller; D E Singer; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Michael A Conditt; Karon F Cook; Kenneth B Mathis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Patients' expectations of knee surgery.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; T P Sculco; T L Wickiewicz; E C Jones; L Robbins; R F Warren; P Williams-Russo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes.

Authors:  M V Mondloch; D C Cole; J W Frank
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  A comparative study of telephone versus onsite completion of the WOMAC 3.0 osteoarthritis index.

Authors:  Nicholas Bellamy; Jane Campbell; Jonathan Hill; Philip Band
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  M Moran; A Khan; D H Sochart; G Andrew
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Patients' reasons for undergoing total hip arthroplasty can change over time.

Authors:  Jay R Lieberman; Bert J Thomas; Gerald A m Finerman; Frederick Dorey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Eisler; O Svensson; A Tengström; E Elmstedt
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nizar N Mahomed; Matthew H Liang; Earl F Cook; Lawren H Daltroy; Paul R Fortin; Anne H Fossel; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  82 in total

1.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

2.  The effect of patient race on total joint replacement recommendations and utilization in the orthopedic setting.

Authors:  Leslie R M Hausmann; Maria Mor; Barbara H Hanusa; Susan Zickmund; Peter Z Cohen; Richard Grant; Denise M Kresevic; Howard S Gordon; Bruce S Ling; C Kent Kwoh; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders.

Authors:  Michael L Pezold; Andrea L Pusic; Wess A Cohen; James P Hollenberg; Zeeshan Butt; David R Flum; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 4.  Preoperative patient education for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Beth Aviva Preminger; Valerie Lemaine; Isabel Sulimanoff; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Development of a new Knee Society scoring system.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Giles R Scuderi; Adam C Brekke; Alla Sikorskii; James B Benjamin; Jess H Lonner; Priya Chadha; Daniel A Daylamani; W Norman Scott; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Factors influencing early rehabilitation after THA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Patrick M Morgan; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Hip replacement in the athlete: is there a role?

Authors:  M J Wilson; R N Villar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  CORR Insights®: When Do Patients Return to Previous Daily Activity After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

Authors:  Ehud Rath
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Reliability and concurrent validity of the Dutch hip and knee replacement expectations surveys.

Authors:  Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Jos J A M van Raay; Inge H F Reininga; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Wiebren Zijlstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Maximum recovery after knee replacement--the MARKER study rationale and protocol.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Lyn March; Jack Crosbie; Ross Crawford; Stephen Graves; Justine Naylor; Alison Harmer; Stephen Jan; Kim Bennell; Ian Harris; David Parker; Helene Moffet; Marlene Fransen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.