Literature DB >> 2280729

Signal strength in subsecond FLASH magnetic resonance imaging: the dynamic approach to steady state.

W Hänicke1, K D Merboldt, D Chien, M L Gyngell, H Bruhn, J Frahm.   

Abstract

Subsecond fast low-angle shot (FLASH) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows single shot studies of the human heart within measuring times of about 100-300 ms depending on the data matrix. In contrast to conventional FLASH MRI subsecond applications acquire data during the approach to steady state. A detailed analysis of the saturation behavior of the signal is given for the ideal case of a rectangular slice profile. In a second step, realistic slice profiles assuming Gaussian-shaped excitation pulses were taken into account by means of a numerical solution of the Bloch equations. It turns out that the signal strength and the resulting image intensity is considerably higher than may be expected from steady-state considerations. Correspondingly optimized flip angles depend on the number of phase-encoding steps. Assuming long T1 relaxation times as, for example, encountered in muscle and brain tissue and repetition times of 5 ms or less, optimum flip angles are 12 degrees-16 degrees. The use of even higher flip angles (greater than or equal to 20 degrees) causes heavily distorted slice profiles and a dynamic increase of the effective slice thickness. Flip angles of the order of the Ernst angle (6 degrees) correspond to steady-state conditions and lead to considerable signal losses. The theoretical results are confirmed by subsecond FLASH MRI studies of the human heart using a 2.0 T whole-body system (Siemens Magnetom).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2280729     DOI: 10.1118/1.596452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Improved quantification of myocardial blood flow using highly constrained back projection reconstruction.

Authors:  David Chen; Behzad Sharif; Rohan Dharmakumar; Louise E J Thomson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Mis-estimation and bias of hyperpolarized apparent diffusion coefficient measurements due to slice profile effects.

Authors:  Jeremy W Gordon; Eugene Milshteyn; Irene Marco-Rius; Michael Ohliger; Daniel B Vigneron; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Characterization and reduction of saturation banding in multiplanar coherent and incoherent steady-state imaging.

Authors:  Jamal J Derakhshan; Mark A Griswold; Sherif G Nour; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Velocity-selective magnetization-prepared non-contrast-enhanced cerebral MR angiography at 3 Tesla: Improved immunity to B0/B1 inhomogeneity.

Authors:  Qin Qin; Taehoon Shin; Michael Schär; Hua Guo; Hanwei Chen; Ye Qiao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Reducing sensitivity losses due to respiration and motion in accelerated echo planar imaging by reordering the autocalibration data acquisition.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Himanshu Bhat; Thomas Witzel; Thomas Benner; Thorsten Feiweier; Souheil J Inati; Ville Renvall; Keith Heberlein; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Whole-brain arteriography and venography: Using improved velocity-selective saturation pulse trains.

Authors:  Wenbo Li; Feng Xu; Michael Schär; Jing Liu; Taehoon Shin; Yansong Zhao; Peter C M van Zijl; Bruce A Wasserman; Ye Qiao; Qin Qin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Carotid plaque assessment using fast 3D isotropic resolution black-blood MRI.

Authors:  Niranjan Balu; Vasily L Yarnykh; Baocheng Chu; Jinnan Wang; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Robust and fast whole brain mapping of the RF transmit field B1 at 7T.

Authors:  Antoine Lutti; Joerg Stadler; Oliver Josephs; Christian Windischberger; Oliver Speck; Johannes Bernarding; Chloe Hutton; Nikolaus Weiskopf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Fast Imaging for Hyperpolarized MR Metabolic Imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy W Gordon; Hsin-Yu Chen; Nicholas Dwork; Shuyu Tang; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.119

10.  A Comparison of Theory-Based and Experimentally Determined Myocardial Signal Intensity Correction Methods in First-Pass Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jacob U Fluckiger; Brandon C Benefield; Lara Bakhos; Kathleen R Harris; Daniel C Lee
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.238

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.