Literature DB >> 27735082

Mis-estimation and bias of hyperpolarized apparent diffusion coefficient measurements due to slice profile effects.

Jeremy W Gordon1, Eugene Milshteyn1, Irene Marco-Rius1, Michael Ohliger1, Daniel B Vigneron1, Peder E Z Larson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to explore the impact of slice profile effects on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping of hyperpolarized (HP) substrates.
METHODS: Slice profile effects were simulated using a Gaussian radiofrequency (RF) pulse with a variety of flip angle schedules and b-value ordering schemes. A long T1 water phantom was used to validate the simulation results, and ADC mapping of HP [13 C,15 N2 ]urea was performed on the murine liver to assess these effects in vivo.
RESULTS: Slice profile effects result in excess signal after repeated RF pulses, causing bias in HP measurements. The largest error occurs for metabolites with small ADCs, resulting in up to 10-fold overestimation for metabolites that are in more-restricted environments. A mixed b-value scheme substantially reduces this bias, whereas scaling the slice-select gradient can mitigate it completely. In vivo, the liver ADC of hyperpolarized [13 C,15 N2 ]urea is nearly 70% lower (0.99 ± 0.22 vs 1.69 ± 0.21 × 10-3 mm2 /s) when slice-select gradient scaling is used.
CONCLUSION: Slice profile effects can lead to bias in HP ADC measurements. A mixed b-value ordering scheme can reduce this bias compared to sequential b-value ordering. Slice-select gradient scaling can also correct for this deviation, minimizing bias and providing more-precise ADC measurements of HP substrates. Magn Reson Med 78:1087-1092, 2017.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC; DNP; diffusion-weighted imaging; hyperpolarization; slice profile effects

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27735082      PMCID: PMC5391314          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  25 in total

1.  Using the "reverse Warburg effect" to identify high-risk breast cancer patients: stromal MCT4 predicts poor clinical outcome in triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Diana Whitaker-Menezes; Abhijit Dasgupta; Nancy J Philp; Zhao Lin; Ricardo Gandara; Sharon Sneddon; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Signal strength in subsecond FLASH magnetic resonance imaging: the dynamic approach to steady state.

Authors:  W Hänicke; K D Merboldt; D Chien; M L Gyngell; H Bruhn; J Frahm
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Gradient-Echo Imaging Considerations for Hyperpolarized 129Xe MR

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1996-11

4.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age.

Authors:  P A Bottomley; T H Foster; R E Argersinger; L M Pfeifer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Assessment of early diabetic renal changes with hyperpolarized [1-(13) C]pyruvate.

Authors:  Christoffer Laustsen; Jakob Appel Østergaard; Mette Hauge Lauritzen; Rikke Nørregaard; Sean Bowen; Lise Vejby Søgaard; Allan Flyvbjerg; Michael Pedersen; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.876

6.  Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sam E Day; Mikko I Kettunen; Ferdia A Gallagher; De-En Hu; Mathilde Lerche; Jan Wolber; Klaes Golman; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Rapid in vivo apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of hyperpolarized (13) C metabolites.

Authors:  Bertram L Koelsch; Galen D Reed; John Kurhanewicz; Peder E Z Larson; Kayvan R Keshari; Myriam M Chaumeil; Robert Bok; Sabrina M Ronen; Daniel B Vigneron
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Detection of transgene expression using hyperpolarized 13C urea and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  P Stephen Patrick; Mikko I Kettunen; Sui-Seng Tee; Tiago B Rodrigues; Eva Serrao; Kerstin N Timm; Sarah McGuire; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1-¹³C]pyruvate.

Authors:  Sarah J Nelson; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron; Peder E Z Larson; Andrea L Harzstark; Marcus Ferrone; Mark van Criekinge; Jose W Chang; Robert Bok; Ilwoo Park; Galen Reed; Lucas Carvajal; Eric J Small; Pamela Munster; Vivian K Weinberg; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Albert P Chen; Ralph E Hurd; Liv-Ingrid Odegardstuen; Fraser J Robb; James Tropp; Jonathan A Murray
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Model free approach to kinetic analysis of real-time hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy data.

Authors:  Deborah K Hill; Matthew R Orton; Erika Mariotti; Jessica K R Boult; Rafal Panek; Maysam Jafar; Harold G Parkes; Yann Jamin; Maria Falck Miniotis; Nada M S Al-Saffar; Mounia Beloueche-Babari; Simon P Robinson; Martin O Leach; Yuen-Li Chung; Thomas R Eykyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cancer in the crosshairs: targeting cancer metabolism with hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI technology.

Authors:  Cornelius von Morze; Matthew E Merritt
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarized agents: methods and applications.

Authors:  Erin B Adamson; Kai D Ludwig; David G Mummy; Sean B Fain
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Using bidirectional chemical exchange for improved hyperpolarized [13 C]bicarbonate pH imaging.

Authors:  David E Korenchan; Jeremy W Gordon; Sukumar Subramaniam; Renuka Sriram; Celine Baligand; Mark VanCriekinge; Robert Bok; Daniel B Vigneron; David M Wilson; Peder E Z Larson; John Kurhanewicz; Robert R Flavell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  3D hyperpolarized C-13 EPI with calibrationless parallel imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy W Gordon; Rie B Hansen; Peter J Shin; Yesu Feng; Daniel B Vigneron; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Dynamic diffusion-weighted hyperpolarized 13 C imaging based on a slice-selective double spin echo sequence for measurements of cellular transport.

Authors:  Xucheng Zhu; Jeremy W Gordon; Robert A Bok; John Kurhanewicz; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Fast Imaging for Hyperpolarized MR Metabolic Imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy W Gordon; Hsin-Yu Chen; Nicholas Dwork; Shuyu Tang; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.119

7.  Non-Invasive Assessment of Lactate Production and Compartmentalization in Renal Cell Carcinomas Using Hyperpolarized 13C Pyruvate MRI.

Authors:  Renuka Sriram; Jeremy Gordon; Celine Baligand; Fayyaz Ahamed; Justin Delos Santos; Hecong Qin; Robert A Bok; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz; Peder E Z Larson; Zhen J Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.