Literature DB >> 22803258

The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Kate Gfeller1, Dingfeng Jiang, Jacob J Oleson, Virginia Driscoll, Carol Olszewski, John F Knutson, Christopher Turner, Bruce Gantz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CI) are effective in transmitting salient features of speech, especially in quiet, but current CI technology is not well suited in transmission of key musical structures (e.g., melody, timbre). It is possible, however, that sung lyrics, which are commonly heard in real-world music may provide acoustical cues that support better music perception.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine how accurately adults who use CIs (n = 87) and those with normal hearing (NH) (n = 17) are able to recognize real-world music excerpts based upon musical and linguistic (lyrics) cues.
RESULTS: CI recipients were significantly less accurate than NH listeners on recognition of real-world music with or, in particular, without lyrics; however, CI recipients whose devices transmitted acoustic plus electric stimulation were more accurate than CI recipients reliant upon electric stimulation alone (particularly items without linguistic cues). Recognition by CI recipients improved as a function of linguistic cues.
METHODS: Participants were tested on melody recognition of complex melodies (pop, country, & classical styles). Results were analyzed as a function of: hearing status and history, device type (electric only or acoustic plus electric stimulation), musical style, linguistic and musical cues, speech perception scores, cognitive processing, music background, age, and in relation to self-report on listening acuity and enjoyment. Age at time of testing was negatively correlated with recognition performance.
CONCLUSIONS: These results have practical implications regarding successful participation of CI users in music-based activities that include recognition and accurate perception of real-world songs (e.g., reminiscence, lyric analysis, & listening for enjoyment).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22803258      PMCID: PMC3400117          DOI: 10.1093/jmt/49.1.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Music Ther        ISSN: 0022-2917


  37 in total

1.  Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music.

Authors:  S Fujita; J Ito
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

4.  Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; G Woodworth; D A Robin; S Witt; J F Knutson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  S Pijl
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; John F Knutson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Virginia D Driscoll; Jacob Oleson; Dingfeng Jiang; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children.

Authors:  Carol Olszewski; Kate Gfeller; Rebecca Froman; Julie Stordahl; Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2005-09

10.  A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults.

Authors:  Rachel E Roditi; Sarah F Poissant; Eva M Bero; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  14 in total

1.  Beyond Technology: The Interaction of Perceptual Accuracy and Experiential Factors in Pediatric Music Engagement.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Adam Schwalje
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Naomi B H Croghan; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  [Music therapy in adults with cochlear implants : Effects on music perception and subjective sound quality].

Authors:  E Hutter; M Grapp; H Argstatter
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Pitch Accuracy of Vocal Singing in Deaf Children With Bimodal Hearing and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Li Xu; Jing Yang; Emily Hahn; Rosalie Uchanski; Lisa Davidson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Emily Guthe; Virginia Driscoll; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2015-09

7.  Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth.

Authors:  Kristen L D'Onofrio; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 8.  Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hwa; Christopher Z Wen; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

9.  Experience Changes How Emotion in Music Is Judged: Evidence from Children Listening with Bilateral Cochlear Implants, Bimodal Devices, and Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sara Giannantonio; Melissa J Polonenko; Blake C Papsin; Gaetano Paludetti; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Contributions of electric and acoustic hearing to bimodal speech and music perception.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; David M Landsberger; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.