Literature DB >> 19415041

A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults.

Rachel E Roditi1, Sarah F Poissant, Eva M Bero, Daniel J Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a predictive model of cochlear implant (CI) performance in postlingually deafened adults that includes contemporary speech perception testing and the hearing history of both ears. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. Multivariate predictors of speech perception after CI surgery included duration of any degree of hearing loss (HL), duration of severe-to-profound HL, age at implantation, and preoperative Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet and HINT sentences in noise scores. Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores served as the dependent variable. To develop the model, we performed a stepwise multiple regression analysis.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with postlingual severe-to-profound HL who received a multichannel CI. Mean follow-up was 28 months. Fifty-five patients were included in the initial bivariate analysis. INTERVENTION(S): Multichannel cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES(S): Predicted and measured postoperative CNC scores.
RESULTS: The regression analysis resulted in a model that accounted for 60% of the variance in postoperative CNC scores. The formula is (pred)CNC score = 76.05 + (-0.08 x DurHL(CI ear)) + (0.38 x pre-HINT sentences in quiet) + (0.04 x long sev-prof HL(either ear)). Duration of HL was in months. The mean difference between predicted and measured postoperative CNC scores was 1.7 percentage points (SD, 16.3).
CONCLUSION: The University of Massachusetts CI formula uses HINT sentence scores and the hearing history of both ears to predict the variance in postoperative monosyllabic word scores. This model compares favorably with previous studies that relied on Central Institute for the Deaf sentence scores and uses patient data collected by most centers in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19415041     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819d3480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  14 in total

1.  The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Il Joon Moon; Eun Yeon Kim; Jin Ok Jeong; Won-Ho Chung; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Cochlear implant rehabilitation in older adults: literature review and proposal of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  James H Clark; Jennifer Yeagle; Alicia I Arbaje; Frank R Lin; John K Niparko; Howard W Francis
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski; John F Knutson; Christopher Turner; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2012

4.  Results of Postoperative, CT-based, Electrode Deactivation on Hearing in Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Benoit M Dawant; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  The Advances in Hearing Rehabilitation and Cochlear Implants in China.

Authors:  Jia-Nan Li; Si Chen; Lei Zhai; Dong-Yi Han; Adrien A Eshraghi; Yong Feng; Shi-Ming Yang; Xue-Zhong Liu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cristen Olds; Luca Pollonini; Homer Abaya; Jannine Larky; Megan Loy; Heather Bortfeld; Michael S Beauchamp; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Use of an adaptive-bandwidth protocol to measure importance functions for simulated cochlear implant frequency channels.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and patients with vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing ear.

Authors:  Erika Celis-Aguilar; Luis Lassaletta; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-28

9.  Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marre W Kaandorp; Cas Smits; Paul Merkus; Joost M Festen; S Theo Goverts
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Brain Plasticity Can Predict the Cochlear Implant Outcome in Adult-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Han; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Hyejin Kang; Seung-Ha Oh; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.