Literature DB >> 16621333

Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.

Anthony A Wright1, Jeffrey S Katz.   

Abstract

Mechanisms of same/different concept learning by rhesus monkeys, capuchin monkeys, and pigeons were studied in terms of how these species learned the task (e.g., item-specific learning versus relational learning) and how rapidly they learned the abstract concept, as the training set size was doubled. They had similar displays, training stimuli, test stimuli, and contingencies. The monkey species learned the abstract concept at similar rates and more rapidly than pigeons, thus showing a quantitative difference across species. All species eventually showed full concept learning (novel-stimulus transfer equivalent to baseline: 128-item set size for monkeys; 256-item set for pigeons), thus showing a qualitative similarity across species. Issues of stimulus regularity/symmetry, generalization from item pairs, and familiarity processing were not considered to be major factors in the final performances, converging on the conclusion that these species were increasingly controlled by the sample-test relationship (i.e., relational processing) leading to full abstract-concept learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16621333     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  33 in total

1.  Emergent identity matching after successive matching training, I: reflexivity or generalized identity.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Monitoring same/different discrimination behavior in time and space: finding differences and anticipatory discrimination behavior.

Authors:  Daniel I Brooks; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

3.  Abstract numerical discrimination learning in rats.

Authors:  Tohru Taniuchi; Junko Sugihara; Mariko Wakashima; Makiko Kamijo
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Individual differences: either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task.

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; Anthony A Wright; Jacquelyne J Rivera; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Testing the translational-symmetry hypothesis of abstract-concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  A case for restricted-domain relational learning.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

Review 7.  Associative concept learning in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Edward A Wasserman; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz; Kent D Bodily; Bradley R Sturz
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Domain is a moving target for relational learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Serial position functions following selective hippocampal lesions in monkeys: effects of delays and interference.

Authors:  Jocelyne Bachevalier; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.