Literature DB >> 27298233

Self-control assessments of capuchin monkeys with the rotating tray task and the accumulation task.

Michael J Beran1, Bonnie M Perdue2, Mattea S Rossettie3, Brielle T James4, Will Whitham4, Bradlyn Walker4, Sara E Futch5, Audrey E Parrish4.   

Abstract

Recent studies of delay of gratification in capuchin monkeys using a rotating tray (RT) task have shown improved self-control performance in these animals in comparison to the accumulation (AC) task. In this study, we investigated whether this improvement resulted from the difference in methods between the rotating tray task and previous tests, or whether it was the result of greater overall experience with delay of gratification tasks. Experiment 1 produced similar performance levels by capuchins monkeys in the RT and AC tasks when identical reward and temporal parameters were used. Experiment 2 demonstrated a similar result using reward amounts that were more similar to previous AC experiments with these monkeys. In Experiment 3, monkeys performed multiple versions of the AC task with varied reward and temporal parameters. Their self-control behavior was found to be dependent on the overall delay to reward consumption, rather than the overall reward amount ultimately consumed. These findings indicate that these capuchin monkeys' self-control capacities were more likely to have improved across studies because of the greater experience they had with delay of gratification tasks. Experiment 4 and Experiment 5 tested new, task-naïve monkeys on both tasks, finding more limited evidence of self-control, and no evidence that one task was more beneficial than the other in promoting self-control. The results of this study suggest that future testing of this kind should focus on temporal parameters and reward magnitude parameters to establish accurate measures of delay of gratification capacity and development in this species and perhaps others.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accumulation task; Capuchin monkeys; Delay of gratification; Rotating tray task; Self-control

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27298233      PMCID: PMC4939108          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  61 in total

Review 1.  How different are robust and gracile capuchin monkeys? An argument for the use of sapajus and cebus.

Authors:  Jessica W Lynch Alfaro; José D E Sousa E Silva; Anthony B Rylands
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  Intertemporal choice--toward an integrative framework.

Authors:  Gregory S Berns; David Laibson; George Loewenstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Summation and quantity judgments of sequentially presented sets by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Katherine A Leighty; Emily H Harris; Daniel Rice
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance.

Authors:  T A Evans; M J Beran; F Paglieri; E Addessi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  The hybrid delay task: can capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so?

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Valentina Focaroli; Jessica Bramlett; Valeria Tierno; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Delay choice versus delay maintenance: different measures of delayed gratification in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Elsa Addessi; Fabio Paglieri; Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Luigi Macchitella; Francesca De Petrillo; Valentina Focaroli
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety.

Authors:  Terrie E Moffitt; Louise Arseneault; Daniel Belsky; Nigel Dickson; Robert J Hancox; Honalee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richie Poulton; Brent W Roberts; Stephen Ross; Malcolm R Sears; W Murray Thomson; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  I'll (not) take that: The reverse-reward contingency task as a test of self-control and inhibition.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Cuttlefish exert self-control in a delay of gratification task.

Authors:  Alexandra K Schnell; Markus Boeckle; Micaela Rivera; Nicola S Clayton; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Chimpanzees' understanding of social leverage.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro; Shona Duguid; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Self-control in crows, parrots and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Markus Boeckle; Sarah A Jelbert; Anna Frohnwieser; Claudia A F Wascher; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  Intra- and interspecific variation in self-control capacities of parrots in a delay of gratification task.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Matthew Petelle; Cecilia Baldoni; Anastasia Krasheninnikova; Eleonora Rovegno; Auguste M P von Bayern
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.899

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.