Literature DB >> 29046428

Spatiotemporal characteristics of retinal response to network-mediated photovoltaic stimulation.

Elton Ho1, Richard Smith2, Georges Goetz1, Xin Lei3, Ludwig Galambos3, Theodore I Kamins3, James Harris3, Keith Mathieson4, Daniel Palanker1,5, Alexander Sher2.   

Abstract

Subretinal prostheses aim at restoring sight to patients blinded by photoreceptor degeneration using electrical activation of the surviving inner retinal neurons. Today, such implants deliver visual information with low-frequency stimulation, resulting in discontinuous visual percepts. We measured retinal responses to complex visual stimuli delivered at video rate via a photovoltaic subretinal implant and by visible light. Using a multielectrode array to record from retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the healthy and degenerated rat retina ex vivo, we estimated their spatiotemporal properties from the spike-triggered average responses to photovoltaic binary white noise stimulus with 70-μm pixel size at 20-Hz frame rate. The average photovoltaic receptive field size was 194 ± 3 μm (mean ± SE), similar to that of visual responses (221 ± 4 μm), but response latency was significantly shorter with photovoltaic stimulation. Both visual and photovoltaic receptive fields had an opposing center-surround structure. In the healthy retina, ON RGCs had photovoltaic OFF responses, and vice versa. This reversal is consistent with depolarization of photoreceptors by electrical pulses, as opposed to their hyperpolarization under increasing light, although alternative mechanisms cannot be excluded. In degenerate retina, both ON and OFF photovoltaic responses were observed, but in the absence of visual responses, it is not clear what functional RGC types they correspond to. Degenerate retina maintained the antagonistic center-surround organization of receptive fields. These fast and spatially localized network-mediated ON and OFF responses to subretinal stimulation via photovoltaic pixels with local return electrodes raise confidence in the possibility of providing more functional prosthetic vision. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Retinal prostheses currently in clinical use have struggled to deliver visual information at naturalistic frequencies, resulting in discontinuous percepts. We demonstrate modulation of the retinal ganglion cells (RGC) activity using complex spatiotemporal stimuli delivered via subretinal photovoltaic implant at 20 Hz in healthy and in degenerate retina. RGCs exhibit fast and localized ON and OFF network-mediated responses, with antagonistic center-surround organization of their receptive fields.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain-machine interface; electrical stimulation; electrophysiology; neural prosthesis; retinal ganglion cells; retinal prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29046428      PMCID: PMC5867391          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00872.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  45 in total

1.  A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses.

Authors:  E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.273

2.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Contrast Sensitivity With a Subretinal Prosthesis and Implications for Efficient Delivery of Visual Information.

Authors:  Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Anatomical identification of extracellularly recorded cells in large-scale multielectrode recordings.

Authors:  Peter H Li; Jeffrey L Gauthier; Max Schiff; Alexander Sher; Daniel Ahn; Greg D Field; Martin Greschner; Edward M Callaway; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Action potentials are required for the lateral transmission of glycinergic transient inhibition in the amphibian retina.

Authors:  P B Cook; P D Lukasiewicz; J S McReynolds
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  TTX attenuates surround inhibition in rabbit retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  W R Taylor
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Tickling the retina: integration of subthreshold electrical pulses can activate retinal neurons.

Authors:  S Sekhar; A Jalligampala; E Zrenner; D L Rathbun
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording.

Authors:  F S Werblin; J E Dowling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Functional connectivity in the retina at the resolution of photoreceptors.

Authors:  Greg D Field; Jeffrey L Gauthier; Alexander Sher; Martin Greschner; Timothy A Machado; Lauren H Jepson; Jonathon Shlens; Deborah E Gunning; Keith Mathieson; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Liam Paninski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

1.  Pixel size limit of the PRIMA implants: from humans to rodents and back.

Authors:  Bing-Yi Wang; Zhijie Charles Chen; Mohajeet Bhuckory; Anna Kochnev Goldstein; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Photovoltaic Restoration of Central Vision in Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Yannick Le Mer; Saddek Mohand-Said; Mahiul Muqit; Jose A Sahel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Restoring Sight with Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Georges Goetz
Journal:  Phys Today       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Cortical Interactions between Prosthetic and Natural Vision.

Authors:  Tamar Arens-Arad; Nairouz Farah; Rivkah Lender; Avital Moshkovitz; Thomas Flores; Daniel Palanker; Yossi Mandel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  STEM CELL THERAPIES, GENE-BASED THERAPIES, OPTOGENETICS, AND RETINAL PROSTHETICS: Current State and Implications for the Future.

Authors:  Edward H Wood; Peter H Tang; Irina De la Huerta; Edward Korot; Stephanie Muscat; Daniel A Palanker; George A Williams
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Vertical-junction photodiodes for smaller pixels in retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Tiffany W Huang; Theodore I Kamins; Zhijie Charles Chen; Bing-Yi Wang; Mohajeet Bhuckory; Ludwig Galambos; Elton Ho; Tong Ling; Sean Afshar; Andrew Shin; Valentina Zuckerman; James S Harris; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Neuromodulation using electroosmosis.

Authors:  Sai Siva Kare; Corey M Rountree; John B Troy; John D Finan; Laxman Saggere
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Photogenerated Electrical Fields for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Giuseppina Polino; Claudia Lubrano; Giuseppe Ciccone; Francesca Santoro
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-09

10.  Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.