Literature DB >> 22790319

Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.

Stanley Sheft1, Valeriy Shafiro, Christian Lorenzi, Rachel McMullen, Caitlin Farrell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The frequency modulation (FM) of speech can convey linguistic information and also enhance speech-stream coherence and segmentation. The purpose of the present study was to use a clinically oriented approach to examine the effects of age and hearing loss on the ability to discriminate between stochastic patterns of low-rate FM and determine whether difficulties in speech perception experienced by older listeners relate to a deficit in this ability.
DESIGN: Data were collected from 18 normal-hearing young adults, and 18 participants who were at least 60 years old, nine of whom had normal hearing and the remaining nine who had a mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Using stochastic frequency modulators derived from 5-Hz low-pass noise applied to a 1-kHz carrier, discrimination thresholds were measured in terms of frequency excursion (ΔF) both in quiet and with a speech-babble masker present, stimulus duration, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR(FM)) in the presence of a speech-babble masker. Speech-perception ability was evaluated using Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) sentences in four-talker babble.
RESULTS: Results showed a significant effect of age but not of hearing loss among the older listeners, for FM discrimination conditions with masking present (ΔF and SNR(FM)). The effect of age was not significant for the FM measures based on stimulus duration. ΔF and SNR(FM) were also the two conditions for which performance was significantly correlated with listener age when controlling for effect of hearing loss as measured by pure-tone average. With respect to speech-in-noise ability, results from the SNR(FM) condition were significantly correlated with QuickSIN performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that aging is associated with reduced ability to discriminate moderate-duration patterns of low-rate stochastic FM. Furthermore, the relationship between QuickSIN performance and the SNR(FM) thresholds suggests that the difficulty experienced by older listeners with speech-in-noise processing may, in part, relate to diminished ability to process slower fine-structure modulation at low sensation levels. Results thus suggest that clinical consideration of stochastic FM discrimination measures may offer a fuller picture of auditory-processing abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790319      PMCID: PMC3480978          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825aab15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  61 in total

1.  Frequency and temporal resolution in elderly listeners with good and poor word recognition.

Authors:  S L Phillips; S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons; G Yeni-Komshian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity.

Authors:  Karen B Snell; Frances M Mapes; Elizabeth D Hickman; D Robert Frisina
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel A McArdle; Sherri L Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection and discrimination of frequency glides as a function of direction, duration, frequency span, and center frequency.

Authors:  J P Madden; K M Fire
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporal pattern discrimination and speech recognition under electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L M Collins; G H Wakefield; G R Feinman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal acuity in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; R C Bilger; D M Green; J H Patterson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1976-06
View more
  26 in total

1.  Effect of musical training on static and dynamic measures of spectral-pattern discrimination.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Kirsten Smayda; Valeriy Shafiro; W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013-06-02

2.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Frederick J Gallun; Marjorie R Leek; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of noise reduction on AM and FM perception.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Axelle Calcus; Sridhar Kalluri; Olaf Strelcyk; Stanley Sheft; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-21

5.  Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; David T Ives; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  [Hearing function and hearing loss in the elderly].

Authors:  G Hesse; S Eichhorn; A Laubert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Effects of noise reduction on AM perception for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Sridhar Kalluri; Olaf Strelcyk; Stanley Sheft; Franck Miermont; Arnaud Coez; Eric Bizaguet; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-05

8.  On Older Listeners' Ability to Perceive Dynamic Pitch.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Richard Wright; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Min-Yu Cheng; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.