Literature DB >> 27177161

On Older Listeners' Ability to Perceive Dynamic Pitch.

Jing Shen, Richard Wright, Pamela E Souza.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Natural speech comes with variation in pitch, which serves as an important cue for speech recognition. The present study investigated older listeners' dynamic pitch perception with a focus on interindividual variability. In particular, we asked whether some of the older listeners' inability to perceive dynamic pitch stems from the higher susceptibility to the interference from formant changes.
METHOD: A total of 22 older listeners and 21 younger controls with at least near-typical hearing were tested on dynamic pitch identification and discrimination tasks using synthetic monophthong and diphthong vowels.
RESULTS: The older listeners' ability to detect changes in pitch varied substantially, even when musical and linguistic experiences were controlled. The influence of formant patterns on dynamic pitch perception was evident in both groups of listeners. Overall, strong pitch contours (i.e., more dynamic) were perceived better than weak pitch contours (i.e., more monotonic), particularly with rising pitch patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings are in accordance with the literature demonstrating some older individuals' difficulty perceiving dynamic pitch cues in speech. Moreover, they suggest that this problem may be prominent when the dynamic pitch is carried by natural speech and when the pitch contour is not strong.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27177161      PMCID: PMC4972016          DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  44 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  A Wingfield; K C Lindfield; H Goodglass
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Use of affective prosody by young and older adults.

Authors:  Kate Dupuis; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-03

4.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Tara Vongpaisal; Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The specificity of age-related decline in interpretation of emotion cues from prosody.

Authors:  Rachel L C Mitchell; Rachel A Kingston; Sofia L Barbosa Bouças
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-06

7.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Richard A Wright; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Cross-modal speech perception in adults and infants using nonspeech auditory stimuli.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; K A Williams; A N Meltzoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Effect of Dynamic Pitch on Speech Recognition in Temporally Modulated Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Age-Related Changes in Voice Emotion Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Older Listeners' Perception of Speech With Strengthened and Weakened Dynamic Pitch Cues in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Non-native Speech Learning in Older Adults.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Casandra Nowicki; Audrey Zong; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-10

7.  Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Foreign Language Learning in Older Adults: Anatomical and Cognitive Markers of Vocabulary Learning Success.

Authors:  Manson Cheuk-Man Fong; Matthew King-Hang Ma; Jeremy Yin To Chui; Tammy Sheung Ting Law; Nga-Yan Hui; Alma Au; William Shiyuan Wang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.