Literature DB >> 9373978

Detection and discrimination of frequency glides as a function of direction, duration, frequency span, and center frequency.

J P Madden1, K M Fire.   

Abstract

The study investigated the ability to detect and discriminate frequency glides under a variety of experimental conditions. The subjects distinguished between a comparison signal that either was level in frequency or was swept across a fixed frequency span, and a target signal that changed more in frequency than the comparison signal. Tone durations were 50 and 400 ms. Nominal center frequencies were 0.5, 2, and 6 kHz; actual center frequencies were varied randomly, or roved, over a range equal to 0.1 times the nominal center frequency. Up- and down-glides were used. The transition span of the comparison signal was either 0, 0.5, 1, or 2 times the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the auditory filter at the nominal center frequency. Discrimination thresholds were obtained for all combinations of center frequency, direction, and span. Overall, thresholds expressed as delta Hz/ERB varied little as a function of center frequency. Glide duration had no effect on discrimination. The 50-ms down-glides were more difficult to detect than the 50-ms up-glides; otherwise, the effect of direction was not significant. With the exception of the 50-ms down-glides, detection/discrimination thresholds were similar for the 0-, 0.5-, and 1-ERB transition spans, but increased significantly for the 2-ERB span. The absence of significant variation across frequency supports a place mechanism for the detection of frequency change in gliding tones, based on the detection of changes in the excitation pattern. An excitation pattern model cannot account for the asymmetry noted for glide detection, however.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373978     DOI: 10.1121/1.420346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Discrimination of direction in fast frequency-modulated tones by rats.

Authors:  Bernhard H Gaese; Isabella King; Christian Felsheim; Joachim Ostwald; Wolfger von der Behrens
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-13

3.  Auditory perception of motor vehicle travel paths.

Authors:  Daniel H Ashmead; D Wesley Grantham; Erin S Maloff; Benjamin Hornsby; Takabun Nakamura; Timothy J Davis; Faith Pampel; Erin G Rushing
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Estimates of internal templates for the detection of sequential tonal patterns.

Authors:  Rong Huang; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Multisensory perceptual interactions between higher-order temporal frequency signals.

Authors:  Lexi E Crommett; Deeksha Madala; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-10-18

6.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Valeriy Shafiro; Christian Lorenzi; Rachel McMullen; Caitlin Farrell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.