Literature DB >> 26500713

Effect of musical training on static and dynamic measures of spectral-pattern discrimination.

Stanley Sheft, Kirsten Smayda, Valeriy Shafiro, W Todd Maddox, Bharath Chandrasekaran.   

Abstract

Both behavioral and physiological studies have demonstrated enhanced processing of speech in challenging listening environments attributable to musical training. The relationship, however, of this benefit to auditory abilities as assessed by psychoacoustic measures remains unclear. Using tasks previously shown to relate to speech-in-noise perception, the present study evaluated discrimination ability for static and dynamic spectral patterns by 49 listeners grouped as either musicians or nonmusicians. The two static conditions measured the ability to detect a change in the phase of a logarithmic sinusoidal spectral ripple of wideband noise with ripple densities of 1.5 and 3.0 cycles per octave chosen to emphasize either timbre or pitch distinctions, respectively. The dynamic conditions assessed temporal-pattern discrimination of 1-kHz pure tones frequency modulated by different lowpass noise samples with thresholds estimated in terms of either stimulus duration or signal-to-noise ratio. Musicians performed significantly better than nonmusicians on all four tasks. Discriminant analysis showed that group membership was correctly predicted for 88% of the listeners with the structure coefficient of each measure greater than 0.51. Results suggest that enhanced processing of static and dynamic spectral patterns defined by low-rate modulation may contribute to the relationship between musical training and speech-in-noise perception. [Supported by NIH.].

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 26500713      PMCID: PMC4613787          DOI: 10.1121/1.4799742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust


  10 in total

1.  Informational masking and musical training.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Brian J Fligor; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Music training for the development of auditory skills.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Karine Delhommeau; Xavier Perrot; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.

Authors:  M A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Temporal pattern discrimination and speech recognition under electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L M Collins; G H Wakefield; G R Feinman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sentence pitch change detection in the native and unfamiliar language in musicians and non-musicians: behavioral, electrophysiological and psychoacoustic study.

Authors:  Chizuru Deguchi; Magali Boureux; Michela Sarlo; Mireille Besson; Massimo Grassi; Daniele Schön; Lucia Colombo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Carrie Lam; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Valeriy Shafiro; Christian Lorenzi; Rachel McMullen; Caitlin Farrell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Auditory Perceptual Abilities Are Associated with Specific Auditory Experience.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Eitan Globerson; Noam Amir
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.