Literature DB >> 21199948

Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition.

Josh H McDermott1, David Wrobleski, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Cocktail parties and other natural auditory environments present organisms with mixtures of sounds. Segregating individual sound sources is thought to require prior knowledge of source properties, yet these presumably cannot be learned unless the sources are segregated first. Here we show that the auditory system can bootstrap its way around this problem by identifying sound sources as repeating patterns embedded in the acoustic input. Due to the presence of competing sounds, source repetition is not explicit in the input to the ear, but it produces temporal regularities that listeners detect and use for segregation. We used a simple generative model to synthesize novel sounds with naturalistic properties. We found that such sounds could be segregated and identified if they occurred more than once across different mixtures, even when the same sounds were impossible to segregate in single mixtures. Sensitivity to the repetition of sound sources can permit their recovery in the absence of other segregation cues or prior knowledge of sounds, and could help solve the cocktail party problem.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199948      PMCID: PMC3024660          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004765108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  T Chi; Y Gao; M C Guyton; P Ru; S Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing.

Authors:  Nandini C Singh; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Naturalistic auditory contrast improves spectrotemporal coding in the cat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Monty A Escabí; Lee M Miller; Heather L Read; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Rapid formation of robust auditory memories: insights from noise.

Authors:  Trevor R Agus; Simon J Thorpe; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones.

Authors:  R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Grouping in pitch perception: effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component.

Authors:  C J Darwin; V Ciocca
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.

Authors:  J F Culling; C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; P S Deliwala; W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory streaming and the building of timbre.

Authors:  A S Bregman; S Pinker
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1978-03
View more
  36 in total

1.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Auditory cortical processing in real-world listening: the auditory system going real.

Authors:  Israel Nelken; Jennifer Bizley; Shihab A Shamma; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space.

Authors:  James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Does the semantic content or syntactic regularity of masker speech affect speech-on-speech recognition?

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Penelope Bencheck; Brandi Jett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Long-term implicit memory for sequential auditory patterns in humans.

Authors:  Roberta Bianco; Peter Mc Harrison; Mingyue Hu; Cora Bolger; Samantha Picken; Marcus T Pearce; Maria Chait
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Discovering acoustic structure of novel sounds.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Michael Kiefte; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Brain responses in humans reveal ideal observer-like sensitivity to complex acoustic patterns.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Marcus T Pearce; Timothy D Griffiths; Karl J Friston; Maria Chait
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.