Literature DB >> 18247236

CAD/CAM transtibial prosthetic sockets from central fabrication facilities: how accurate are they?

Joan E Sanders1, Ellen L Rogers, Elizabeth A Sorenson, Gregory S Lee, Daniel C Abrahamson.   

Abstract

This research compares transtibial prosthetic sockets made by central fabrication facilities with their corresponding American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP) electronic shape files and assesses the central fabrication process. We ordered three different socket shapes from each of 10 manufacturers. Then we digitized the sockets using a very accurate custom mechanical digitizer. Results showed that quality varied considerably among the different manufacturers. Four of the companies consistently made sockets within +/-1.1% volume (approximately 1 sock ply) of the AAOP electronic shape file, while six other companies did not. Six of the companies showed consistent undersizing or oversizing in their sockets, which suggests a consistent calibration or manufacturing error. Other companies showed inconsistent sizing or shape distortion, a difficult problem that represents a most challenging limitation for central fabrication facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18247236      PMCID: PMC4423802          DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.06.0069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  4 in total

1.  The use of CAD/CAM technology in prosthetics and orthotics--current clinical models and a view to the future.

Authors:  D G Smith; E M Burgess
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  A digitizer with exceptional accuracy for use in prosthetics research: a technical note.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Stuart B Mitchell; Santosh G Zachariah; Kelvin Wu
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

3.  A method for aligning trans-tibial residual limb shapes so as to identify regions of shape change.

Authors:  Santosh G Zachariah; Elizabeth Sorenson; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Volume fluctuations in the residual limbs of lower limb amputees.

Authors:  G R Fernie; P J Holliday
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.966

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Assessment technique for computer-aided manufactured sockets.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

2.  Measuring foam model shapes with a contact digitizer.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Central fabrication: carved positive assessment.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

5.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Influence of prior activity on residual limb volume and shape measured using plaster casting: results from individuals with transtibial limb loss.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance; David L Swartzendruber; Katheryn J Allyn; Marcia A Ciol
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

7.  The Use of Smartphone Photogrammetry to Digitise Transtibial Sockets: Optimisation of Method and Quantitative Evaluation of Suitability.

Authors:  Sean Cullen; Ruth Mackay; Amir Mohagheghi; Xinli Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.