Literature DB >> 22766849

Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Jean-Marc Aimonetti1, Jean-Pierre Roll, Valérie Hospod, Edith Ribot-Ciscar.   

Abstract

We analyzed the cutaneous encoding of two-dimensional movements by investigating the coding of movement velocity for differently oriented straight-line movements and the coding of complex trajectories describing cursive letters. The cutaneous feedback was then compared with that of the underlying muscle afferents previously recorded during the same "writing-like" movements. The unitary activity of 43 type II cutaneous afferents was recorded in the common peroneal nerve in healthy subjects during imposed ankle movements. These movements consisted first of ramp-and-hold movements imposed at two different and close velocities in seven directions and secondly of "writing-like" movements. In both cases, the responses were analyzed using the neuronal population vector model. The results show that movement velocity encoding depended on the direction of the ongoing movement. Discriminating between two velocities therefore involved processing the activity of afferent populations located in the various skin areas surrounding the moving joint, as shown by the statistically significant difference observed in the amplitude of the sum vectors. Secondly, "writing-like" movements induced cutaneous neuronal patterns of activity, which were reproducible and specific to each trajectory. Lastly, the "cutaneous neuronal trajectories," built by adding the sum vectors tip-to-tail, nearly matched both the movement trajectories and the "muscle neuronal trajectories," built from previously recorded muscle afferents. It was concluded that type II cutaneous and the underlying muscle afferents show similar encoding properties of two-dimensional movement parameters. This similarity is discussed in relation to a central gating process that would for instance increase the gain of cutaneous inputs when muscle information is altered by the fusimotor drive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766849     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3160-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Sensory integration in the perception of movements at the human metacarpophalangeal joint.

Authors:  D F Collins; K M Refshauge; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area.

Authors:  M Knibestöl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Combined contribution of tactile and proprioceptive feedback to hand movement perception.

Authors:  Caroline Blanchard; Régine Roll; Jean-Pierre Roll; Anne Kavounoudias
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand.

Authors:  B B Edin; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Proprio-tactile integration for kinesthetic perception: an fMRI study.

Authors:  A Kavounoudias; J P Roll; J L Anton; B Nazarian; M Roth; R Roll
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin.

Authors:  B B Edin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Neural coding of the direction of reaching and a comparison with saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1990

8.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; K E Hagbarth
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; R S Johansson
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984
View more
  10 in total

1.  Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.

Authors:  Robyn L Mildren; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Noise-enhanced kinaesthesia: a psychophysical and microneurographic study.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Marc Aimonetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A cutaneous positioning system.

Authors:  Bernard J Martin; Beom-Chan Lee; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  MIDFOOT AND FOREFOOT INVOLVEMENT IN LATERAL ANKLE SPRAINS AND CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITY. PART 1: ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS.

Authors:  John J Fraser; Mark A Feger; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

5.  Effects of White Noise Achilles Tendon Vibration on Quiet Standing and Active Postural Positioning.

Authors:  Carly C Sacco; Erin M Gaffney; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 1.833

6.  Low back skin sensitivity has minimal impact on active lumbar spine proprioception and stability in healthy adults.

Authors:  Shawn M Beaudette; Katelyn J Larson; Dennis J Larson; Stephen H M Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Proprioceptive sensitivity to imposed finger deflections.

Authors:  Katie H Long; Kristine R McLellan; Maria Boyarinova; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Differential contributions of vision, touch and muscle proprioception to the coding of hand movements.

Authors:  Caroline Blanchard; Régine Roll; Jean-Pierre Roll; Anne Kavounoudias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sensory Integration during Vibration of Postural Muscle Tendons When Pointing to a Memorized Target.

Authors:  Normand Teasdale; Mariusz P Furmanek; Mathieu Germain Robitaille; Fabio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Cutaneous stimulation at the ankle: a differential effect on proprioceptive postural control according to the participants' preferred sensory strategy.

Authors:  Sébastien Pavailler; Frédérique Hintzy; Nicolas Horvais; Nicolas Forestier
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.303

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.