Literature DB >> 25600816

A cutaneous positioning system.

Bernard J Martin1, Beom-Chan Lee, Kathleen H Sienko.   

Abstract

Our previous work revealed that torso cutaneous information contributes to the internal representation of the torso and plays a role in postural control. Hence, the aims of this study were to assess whether posture could be manipulated by patterns of vibrotactile stimulation and to determine whether resulting modified postures were associated with specific and consistent spatial attitudes. Ten healthy young adults stood in normal and Romberg stances with six vibrating actuators positioned on the torso in contact with the skin over the anatomical locations corresponding to left and right external oblique, internal oblique and erector spinae muscles at the L4/L5 vertebrae level. A 250-Hz tactile vibration was applied for 5 s either at a single location or consecutively at each location in clockwise or counterclockwise sequences. Kinematic analysis of the body segments indicated that postural responses observed in response to single and sequential stimulation patterns were similar, while the center of pressure remained unaltered in any situations. Moreover, torso inclinations followed rectilinear-like path segments chartered by stimuli loci during sequential stimulations. Comparison of torso attitudes with previous results obtained with co-vibration patterns of the same duration showed that torso inclination amplitudes are equivalent for single (one location) and co-vibration (pairs of locations) patterns inducing the same directional effect. Hence, torso cutaneous information exhibits kinesthetic properties, appears to provide a map of upper body spatial configuration, and could assume the role of an internal positioning system for the upper body.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25600816     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4194-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Combined contribution of tactile and proprioceptive feedback to hand movement perception.

Authors:  Caroline Blanchard; Régine Roll; Jean-Pierre Roll; Anne Kavounoudias
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Cutaneous afferents from human plantar sole contribute to body posture awareness.

Authors:  Régine Roll; Anne Kavounoudias; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  The effects of muscle vibration on anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Harm Slijper; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  From balance regulation to body orientation: two goals for muscle proprioceptive information processing?

Authors:  A Kavounoudias; J C Gilhodes; R Roll; J P Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Directional postural responses induced by vibrotactile stimulations applied to the torso.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Bernard J Martin; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Postural reorganization induced by torso cutaneous covibration.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Bernard J Martin; Allison Ho; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Proprioceptive sensation at the terminal joint of the middle finger.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; L A Hall; D I McCloskey; E K Potter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Biofeedback improves postural control recovery from multi-axis discrete perturbations.

Authors:  Kathleen H Sienko; M David Balkwill; Conrad Wall
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  6 in total

1.  Proprioceptive ability at the lips and jaw measured using the same psychophysical discrimination task.

Authors:  Ellie Frayne; Susan Coulson; Roger Adams; Glen Croxson; Gordon Waddington
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Low back skin sensitivity has minimal impact on active lumbar spine proprioception and stability in healthy adults.

Authors:  Shawn M Beaudette; Katelyn J Larson; Dennis J Larson; Stephen H M Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vibrotactile cuing revisited to reveal a possible challenge to sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Timothy A Thrasher; Charles S Layne; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effects of different sensory augmentation on weight-shifting balance exercises in Parkinson's disease and healthy elderly people: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Timothy A Thrasher; Stanley P Fisher; Charles S Layne
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 5.  Potential Mechanisms of Sensory Augmentation Systems on Human Balance Control.

Authors:  Kathleen H Sienko; Rachael D Seidler; Wendy J Carender; Adam D Goodworth; Susan L Whitney; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Age-Dependent Asymmetry of Wrist Position Sense Is Not Influenced by Stochastic Tactile Stimulation.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Georgarakis; Harshal A Sonar; Mike D Rinderknecht; Werner L Popp; Jaime E Duarte; Olivier Lambercy; Jamie Paik; Bernard J Martin; Robert Riener; Verena Klamroth-Marganska
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.