Literature DB >> 26823342

Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.

Robyn L Mildren1, Leah R Bent2.   

Abstract

It has previously been shown that cutaneous sensory input from across a broad region of skin can influence proprioception at joints of the hand. The present experiment tested whether cutaneous input from different skin regions across the foot can influence proprioception at the ankle joint. The ability to passively match ankle joint position (17° and 7° plantar flexion and 7° dorsiflexion) was measured while cutaneous vibration was applied to the sole (heel, distal metatarsals) or dorsum of the target foot. Vibration was applied at two different frequencies to preferentially activate Meissner's corpuscles (45 Hz, 80 μm) or Pacinian corpuscles (255 Hz, 10 μm) at amplitudes ∼3 dB above mean perceptual thresholds. Results indicated that cutaneous input from all skin regions across the foot could influence joint-matching error and variability, although the strongest effects were observed with heel vibration. Furthermore, the influence of cutaneous input from each region was modulated by joint angle; in general, vibration had a limited effect on matching in dorsiflexion compared with matching in plantar flexion. Unlike previous results in the upper limb, we found no evidence that Pacinian input exerted a stronger influence on proprioception compared with Meissner input. Findings from this study suggest that fast-adapting cutaneous input from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint in a passive joint-matching task. These results indicate that there is interplay between tactile and proprioceptive signals originating from the foot and ankle.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle joint; cutaneous afferent; mechanoreceptor; proprioception; sensory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26823342      PMCID: PMC4835905          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00810.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  50 in total

1.  Proprioceptively guided reaching movements in 3D space: effects of age, task complexity and handedness.

Authors:  T S Schaap; T I Gonzales; T W J Janssen; S H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Skin sensory information from the dorsum of the foot and ankle is necessary for kinesthesia at the ankle joint.

Authors:  Catherine R Lowrey; Nick D J Strzalkowski; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Modulation of cutaneous cortical evoked potentials during isometric and isotonic contractions in the monkey.

Authors:  W Jiang; Y Lamarre; C E Chapman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1990-12-17       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand.

Authors:  B B Edin; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The contribution of motor commands to position sense differs between elbow and wrist.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; Uwe Proske; Trevor J Allen; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Inhibition of cuneate neurones: its afferent source and influence on dynamically sensitive "tactile" neurones.

Authors:  E Bystrzycka; B S NAil; M Rowe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mechanical sensibility of the sole of the foot determined with vibratory stimuli of varying frequency.

Authors:  J Kekoni; H Hämäläinen; J Rautio; T Tukeva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements.

Authors:  R S Johansson; U Landström; R Lundström
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Signals of motor command bias joint position sense in the presence of feedback from proprioceptors.

Authors:  Janette L Smith; Matthew Crawford; Uwe Proske; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-12-31

10.  Motor output variability, deafferentation, and putative deficits in kinesthetic reafference in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Torres; Jonathan Cole; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of barefoot and footwear conditions on learning of a dynamic balance task: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Astrid Zech; Stephanie Meining; Kirsten Hötting; Dominik Liebl; Klaus Mattes; Karsten Hollander
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Online visual cues can compensate for deficits in cutaneous feedback from the dorsal ankle joint for the trailing limb but not the leading limb during obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Erika E Howe; Adam J Toth; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The firing characteristics of foot sole cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferents in response to vibration stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; R Ayesha Ali; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural correlates of lower limbs proprioception: An fMRI study of foot position matching.

Authors:  Riccardo Iandolo; Alessandro Bellini; Catarina Saiote; Ilaria Marre; Giulia Bommarito; Niels Oesingmann; Lazar Fleysher; Giovanni Luigi Mancardi; Maura Casadio; Matilde Inglese
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Foot sole cutaneous stimulation mitigates neuromuscular fatigue during a sustained plantar flexor isometric task.

Authors:  Simone G V S Smith; Geoffrey A Power; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-06-25

6.  Plantar Sole Unweighting Alters the Sensory Transmission to the Cortical Areas.

Authors:  Laurence Mouchnino; Olivia Lhomond; Clément Morant; Pascale Chavet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review.

Authors:  Usman Ghafoor; Sohee Kim; Keum-Shik Hong
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Strong association between vibration perception thresholds at low frequencies (4 and 8 Hz), neuropathic symptoms and diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Eero Lindholm; Magnus Löndahl; Katarina Fagher; Jan Apelqvist; Lars B Dahlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adaptation of emotional state and standing balance parameters following repeated exposure to height-induced postural threat.

Authors:  Martin Zaback; Allan L Adkin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Vibrotactile perception on the sole of the foot in an older group of people with normal glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Magnus Peterson; Ronnie Pingel; Olov Rolandsson; Lars B Dahlin
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.