Literature DB >> 11101658

Sensory integration in the perception of movements at the human metacarpophalangeal joint.

D F Collins1, K M Refshauge, S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

These experiments were designed to investigate illusions of movements of the fingers produced by combined feedback from muscle spindle receptors and receptors located in different regions of the skin of the hand. Vibration (100 Hz) applied in cyclic bursts (4 s 'on', 4 s 'off') over the tendons of the finger extensors of the right wrist produced illusions of flexion-extension of the fingers. Cutaneous receptors were activated by local skin stretch and electrical stimulation. Illusory movements at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were measured from voluntary matching movements made with the left hand. Localised stretch of the dorsal skin over specific MCP joints altered vibration-induced illusions in 8/10 subjects. For the group, this combined stimulation produced movement illusions at MCP joints under, adjacent to, and two joints away from the stretched region of skin that were 176 +/- 33, 122 +/- 9 and 67 +/- 11 % of the size of those from vibration alone, respectively. Innocuous electrical stimulation over the same skin regions, but not at the digit tips, also 'focused' the sensation of movement to the stimulated digit. Stretch of the dorsal skin and compression of the ventral skin around one MCP joint altered the vibration-induced illusions in all subjects. The illusions became more focused, being 295 +/- 57, 116 +/- 18 and 65 +/- 7 % of the corresponding vibration-induced illusions at MCP joints that were under, adjacent to, and two joints away from the stimulated regions of skin, respectively. These results show that feedback from cutaneous and muscle spindle receptors is continuously integrated for the perception of finger movements. The contribution from the skin was not simply a general facilitation of sensations produced by muscle receptors but, when the appropriate regions of skin were stimulated, movement illusions were focused to the joint under the stimulated skin. One role for cutaneous feedback from the hand may be to help identify which finger joint is moving.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11101658      PMCID: PMC2270207          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00505.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  40 in total

1.  Functional organization of tactile inputs from the hand in the cuneate nucleus and its relationship to organization in the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  J Xu; J T Wall
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-08-30       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Sensory characteristics of monkey thalamic and motor cortex neurones.

Authors:  E G Butler; M K Horne; J A Rawson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand.

Authors:  B B Edin; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin.

Authors:  B B Edin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effects of muscle conditioning on movement detection thresholds at the human forearm.

Authors:  A K Wise; J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-09-30       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Kinesthetic sensibility.

Authors:  D I McCloskey
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Thalamic relay for group I muscle afferents of forelimb nerves in the monkey.

Authors:  R Maendly; D G Rüegg; M Wiesendanger; R Wiesendanger; J Lagowska; B Hess
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Proprioceptive sensation at the terminal joint of the middle finger.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; L A Hall; D I McCloskey; E K Potter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man.

Authors:  J C Gilhodes; J P Roll; M F Tardy-Gervet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  28 in total

1.  Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The detection of human finger movement is not facilitated by input from receptors in adjacent digits.

Authors:  K M Refshauge; D F Collins; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Coding of position by simultaneously recorded sensory neurones in the cat dorsal root ganglion.

Authors:  R B Stein; D J Weber; Y Aoyagi; A Prochazka; J B M Wagenaar; S Shoham; R A Normann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Valérie Hospod; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion.

Authors:  P J Cordo; V S Gurfinkel; S Brumagne; C Flores-Vieira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Temporal discrimination of two passive movements in humans: a new psychophysical approach to assessing kinaesthesia.

Authors:  Michele Tinazzi; Clementina Stanzani; Mirta Fiorio; Nicola Smania; Giuseppe Moretto; Antonio Fiaschi; Mark J Edwards; Kailash P Bhatia; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cutaneous reflexes during rhythmic arm cycling are insensitive to asymmetrical changes in crank length.

Authors:  Sandra R Hundza; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cutaneous afferents provide a neuronal population vector that encodes the orientation of human ankle movements.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Pierre Roll; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Impairment of human proprioception by high-frequency cutaneous vibration.

Authors:  N S Weerakkody; D A Mahns; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effects of a compression garment on sensory feedback transmission in the human upper limb.

Authors:  Trevor S Barss; Gregory E P Pearcey; Bridget Munro; Jennifer L Bishop; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.