Literature DB >> 2051199

Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand.

B B Edin1, J H Abbs.   

Abstract

1. The movement sensitivity of dorsal skin mechanoreceptors in the human hand was studied by the use of single afferent recording techniques. 2. Units were classified as slowly (SA) and fast adapting (FA) and further characterized by thresholds to vertical indentation and by receptive-field sizes. Whereas SA units were evenly distributed within the supply area of the superficial branch of the radial nerve. FA units were usually situated near joints. 3. The proportion of different receptor types (32% SAI, 32% SAII, 28% FAI, 8% FAII; n = 107) compared favorably with previous electrophysiological and anatomic data, arguing for minimal sampling bias. The majority of the skin mechanoreceptive units were SA, largely due to a relative scarcity of FAII [Pacinian corpuscles (PC)] units. 4. A large majority (92%) of the afferents responded to active hand or finger movements. Responses in all unit types were consistent with observed movement-induced deformations of their receptive fields. 5. FAI units responded bidirectionally, albeit usually with somewhat higher discharge frequencies for finger flexion, which in most cases were associated with skin stretch. FAI units showed meager responses to remote stimuli, typically responding to one or, at the most, two adjacent joints. 6. SA units typically showed simple directional responses to joint movements with an increased discharge during flexion and a reduced discharge during extension. Joint movement that influenced the skin within the receptive field of SA units elicited graded responses even if the field, as assessed by perpendicular indentations, was minute. This finding suggests that definition of cutaneous receptive fields by classical perpendicular indentations may be inappropriate for the receptors in the hairy, nonglabrous skin. 7. The interpretation of the data from these recordings suggests that cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin can provide the CNS with detailed kinematic information, at least for movements of the hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2051199     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.65.3.657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  78 in total

1.  Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  E Naito; H H Ehrsson; S Geyer; K Zilles; P E Roland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sensory integration in the perception of movements at the human metacarpophalangeal joint.

Authors:  D F Collins; K M Refshauge; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole.

Authors:  Paul M Kennedy; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Modulation of intracortical neuronal circuits in human hand motor area by digit stimulation.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Jane Ng; Hugo Théoret; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Firing properties of spinal interneurons during voluntary movement. I. State-dependent regularity of firing.

Authors:  Yifat Prut; Steve I Perlmutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The detection of human finger movement is not facilitated by input from receptors in adjacent digits.

Authors:  K M Refshauge; D F Collins; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Valérie Hospod; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Active Touch and Self-Motion Encoding by Merkel Cell-Associated Afferents.

Authors:  Kyle S Severson; Duo Xu; Margaret Van de Loo; Ling Bai; David D Ginty; Daniel H O'Connor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Postural stabilization from fingertip contact II. Relationships between age, tactile sensibility and magnitude of contact forces.

Authors:  François Tremblay; Annie-Claude Mireault; Liam Dessureault; Hélène Manning; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.