Literature DB >> 22755727

Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients.

Carrie B Hruska1, Amanda L Weinmann, Christina M Tello Skjerseth, Eric M Wagenaar, Amy L Conners, Cindy L Tortorelli, Robert W Maxwell, Deborah J Rhodes, Michael K O'Connor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) has shown promise as an adjunct screening technique to mammography for women with dense breasts. The demonstration of reliable lesion detection with MBI performed at low administered doses of Tc-99 m sestamibi, comparable in effective radiation dose to screening mammography, is essential to adoption of MBI for screening. The concept of performing low-dose MBI with dual-head cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) gamma cameras has been investigated in phantoms in Part I. In this work, the objectives were to evaluate the impact of the count sensitivity improvement methods on image quality in patient MBI exams and to determine if adequate lesion detection could be achieved at reduced doses.
METHODS: Following the implementation of two count sensitivity improvement methods, registered collimation optimized for near-field imaging and energy acceptance window optimized for CZT, MBI exams were performed in the course of clinical care. Clinical image count density (counts/cm(2)) was compared between standard MBI [740 MBq (20 mCi) Tc-99 m sestamibi, standard collimation, standard energy window] and low-dose MBI [296 MBq (8 mCi) Tc-99 m sestamibi, optimized collimation, wide energy window] in a cohort of 50 patients who had both types of MBI exams performed. Lesion detection at low doses was evaluated in a separate cohort of 32 patients, in which low-dose MBI was performed following 296 MBq injection and acquired in dynamic mode, allowing the generation of images acquired for 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 min/breast view with proportionately reduced count densities. Diagnostic accuracy at each count density level was compared and kappa statistic was used to assess intrareader agreement between 10 min acquisitions and those at shorter acquisition durations.
RESULTS: In patient studies, low-dose MBI performed with 296 MBq Tc-99 m sestamibi and new optimal collimation/wide energy window resulted in an average relative gain in count density of 4.2 ± 1.3 compared to standard MBI performed with 740 MBq. Interpretation of low-dose 296 MBq images with count densities corresponding to acquisitions of 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 min/view and median lesion size of 1.4 cm resulted in similar diagnostic accuracy across count densities and substantial to near-perfect intrareader agreement between full 10 min-views and lower count density views.
CONCLUSIONS: Review of patient studies showed that registered optimized collimation and wide energy window resulted in a substantial gain in count sensitivity as previously indicated by phantom results. This proof of concept work indicates that MBI performed at administered doses of 296 MBq Tc-99 m sestamibi with the applied count sensitivity improvements permits the detection of small breast lesions in patients. Findings suggest that further reductions in acquisition duration or administered dose may be achievable.
© 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22755727      PMCID: PMC3376157          DOI: 10.1118/1.4719959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Stephen W Phillips; Dana H Whaley; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Hua Li; Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Conor B Clancy; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Noncardiac applications of hexakis(alkylisonitrile) technetium-99m complexes.

Authors:  D Piwnica-Worms; B L Holman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Ion transport systems in the uptake of 99Tcm-tetrofosmin, 99Tcm-MIBI and 201Tl in a tumour cell line.

Authors:  A S Arbab; K Koizumi; K Toyama; T Arai; T Araki
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; N Oestreicher; P L Porter; D White; C A Finder; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert Rosenberg; Carolyn M Rutter; Berta M Geller; Linn A Abraham; Steven H Taplin; Mark Dignan; Gary Cutter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Peggy L Porter; Constance Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Emily White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.

Authors:  C Byrne; C Schairer; J Wolfe; N Parekh; M Salane; L A Brinton; R Hoover; R Haile
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  21 in total

1.  Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Zongyi Gong; Kelly Klanian; Tushita Patel; Olivia Sullivan; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2015-01-01

4.  Collimator design for a dedicated molecular breast imaging-guided biopsy system: proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Amanda L Weinmann; Carrie B Hruska; Amy L Conners; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparison of breast specific gamma imaging and molecular breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection: Evaluation in phantoms.

Authors:  Zongyi Gong; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  99mTc-sestamibi using a direct conversion molecular breast imaging system to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  David Mitchell; Carrie B Hruska; Judy C Boughey; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; Katie N Jones; Cindy Tortorelli; Amy Lynn Conners; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Deborah J Rhodes; Amy Lynn Conners; Katie N Jones; Rickey E Carter; Ravi K Lingineni; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Adsorption of 99mTc-sestamibi onto plastic syringes: evaluation of factors affecting the degree of adsorption and their impact on clinical studies.

Authors:  Tiffinee N Swanson; Duong T Troung; Andrew Paulsen; Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2013-11-08

Review 9.  Clinical usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality to mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Wei Wei; Hua-Wei Yang; Jian-Lun Liu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Radionuclide methods and instrumentation for breast cancer detection and diagnosis.

Authors:  Suleman Surti
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.