Literature DB >> 22744412

Inflammatory reaction and neotissue maturation in the early host tissue incorporation of polypropylene prostheses.

G Pascual1, M Rodríguez, S Sotomayor, B Pérez-Köhler, J M Bellón.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use prosthetic materials for the surgical repair of abdominal wall defects has become almost standard practice. This study was designed to assess the expression of different growth factors (VEGF/TGF-β1) and macrophages during the early host tissue incorporation of several polypropylene lightweight (PP-LW)-including one partially absorbable-and heavyweight (PP-HW) prosthetic meshes.
METHODS: Ventral defects were created in the anterior abdominal wall of New Zealand rabbits and repaired by fixing PP-LW meshes of different pore size and a low porosity PP-HW mesh to the edges of the defect. Following killing 14 days after implant, specimens were taken to examine TGF-β1/VEGF gene and protein expression by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. The macrophage response was also assessed.
RESULTS: All the materials showed good host tissue incorporation, with a more severe inflammatory reaction and greater numbers of macrophages recorded in the partially absorbable LW implants. Relative amounts of VEGF mRNA were significantly lower for the LW partially absorbable implants compared with the remaining LW meshes. Protein expression of VEGF showed undetectable or minimum staining in the different groups. TGF-β1 mRNA levels were also lower in the partially absorbable group compared with one of PP-LW type of mesh. Gene expression patterns were consistent with the TGF-β1 protein levels detected.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that VEGF and TGF-β1 expression were independent of mesh pore size. The expression of both growth factors and the macrophage response were correlated with the presence of biodegradable material in the mesh. The presence of absorbable material in the LW mesh gave rise to a more intense inflammatory reaction and the reduced synthesis of growth factors known to contribute to neotissue maturation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22744412     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-0945-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  31 in total

1.  [Minimized polypropylene mesh for preperitoneal net plasty (PNP) of incisional hernias].

Authors:  V Schumpelick; B Klosterhalfen; M Müller; U Klinge
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Vypro II mesh in hernia repair: impact of polyglactin on long-term incorporation in rats.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; R Quester; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 3.  The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair.

Authors:  Bernd Klosterhalfen; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  U Klinge
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A lightweight, partially absorbable mesh (Ultrapro) for endoscopic hernia repair: experimental biocompatibility results obtained with a porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; F Sommerer; A Tannapfel; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cytokine modifications after tension-free hernioplasty or open conventional inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  G Di Vita; S Milano; R Patti; D Raimondo; G Di Bella; P D'Agostino; P Leo; E Cillari
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Tension-free hernia repair is associated with an increase in inflammatory response markers against the mesh.

Authors:  G Di Vita; S Milano; M Frazzetta; R Patti; V Palazzolo; C Barbera; V Ferlazzo; P Leo; E Cillari
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  S Post; B Weiss; M Willer; T Neufang; D Lorenz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair.

Authors:  V Schumpelick; U Klinge; K Junge; M Stumpf
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  H Scheidbach; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

1.  Tissue integration and inflammatory reaction in full-thickness abdominal wall repair using an innovative composite mesh.

Authors:  G Pascual; S Sotomayor; M Rodríguez; Y Bayon; J M Bellón
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Remodeling characteristics and collagen distribution in synthetic mesh materials explanted from human subjects after abdominal wall reconstruction: an analysis of remodeling characteristics by patient risk factors and surgical site classifications.

Authors:  Jaime A Cavallo; Andres A Roma; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jenny Ousley; Jennifer Creamer; Matthew D Pichert; Sara Baalman; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparative study of shrinkage, inflammatory response and fibroplasia in heavyweight and lightweight meshes.

Authors:  L Zogbi; E N Trindade; M R M Trindade
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Evaluation of three purely polypropylene meshes of different pore sizes in an onlay position in a New Zealand white rabbit model.

Authors:  J Jerabek; T Novotny; K Vesely; J Cagas; V Jedlicka; P Vlcek; I Capov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Experimental study of inflammatory response and collagen morphometry with different types of meshes.

Authors:  C T Maeda; R Artigani Neto; G J Lopes-Filho; M M Linhares
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Early and late postoperative inflammatory and collagen deposition responses in three different meshes: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  C G Pereira-lucena; R Artigiani Neto; D T de Rezende; G de J Lopes-Filho; D Matos; M M Linhares
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: how can we do better?

Authors:  Giulia Gigliobianco; Sabiniano Roman Regueros; Nadir I Osman; Julio Bissoli; Anthony J Bullock; Chris R Chapple; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Acute inflammatory response in the subcutaneous versus periprosthethic space after incisional hernia repair: an original article.

Authors:  Rosalia Patti; Anna Maria Caruso; Paolo Aiello; Giuseppe Livio Angelo; Salvatore Buscemi; Gaetano Di Vita
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  BETWEEN PROLENE®, ULTRAPRO® AND BARD SOFT® MESHES WHICH PRESENTS THE BEST PERFORMANCE IN THE REPAIR OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL?

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Lima Utrabo; Nicolau Gregori Czeczko; Cesar Roberto Busato; Mário Rodrigues Montemór-Netto; Leandro Lipinski; Osvaldo Malafaia
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Immunological reaction and oxidative stress after light or heavy polypropylene mesh implantation in inguinal hernioplasty: A CONSORT-prospective, randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcello Donati; Giovanna Brancato; Giuseppe Grosso; Giovanni Li Volti; Giuseppina La Camera; Francesco Cardì; Francesco Basile; Angelo Donati
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.