Literature DB >> 17963002

A lightweight, partially absorbable mesh (Ultrapro) for endoscopic hernia repair: experimental biocompatibility results obtained with a porcine model.

C Schug-Pass1, C Tamme, F Sommerer, A Tannapfel, H Lippert, F Köckerling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A meticulous surgical technique, a mesh of adequate dimensions, and use of a mesh with good biocompatibility properties are decisively important for minimizing the development of recurrences after endoscopic hernia repair surgery. Mesh "shrinkage" is a function of the mesh's biocompatibility, that is, the properties of the mesh. Large-pore, lightweight polypropylene meshes possess the best biocompatibility, and the newly developed meshes meet these requirements.
METHODS: Using a totally extraperitoneal technique in an experimental animal model, 10 domestic pigs were implanted with a lightweight, large-pore polypropylene mesh containing an absorbable component consisting of poliglecaprone (Ultrapro). After a period of 91 days, diagnostic laparoscopy followed by explantation of the specimens for macroscopic, histologic, and immunohistochemical evaluation was performed.
RESULTS: The mean mesh shrinkage was a mere 1.9%. The partial volume of the inflammatory cells was a low 15.8%. The markers of cell turnover, namely Ki67 and the apoptosis index, were, at 5.8 and 2.1, respectively, also very low. The extracellular matrix showed a low value of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) (50.8). The mean value of collagen 1 was 136.9.
CONCLUSIONS: As a result of its good biocompatibility and elastic properties, the lightweight, large-pore Ultrapo mesh showed only a very slight tendency to "shrink." This renders it extremely well suited for clinical use in hernia repair surgery, and its minimal shrinkage characteristic should help in achieving low complication and recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17963002     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9585-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes.

Authors:  G Welty; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; R Kasperk; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh hernia repair.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; A N Kingsnorth; R G Molloy; P K Small; B Lammers; G Horeyseck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with titanium-coated lightweight polypropylene mesh: early results.

Authors:  C Tamme; N Garde; A Klingler; C Hampe; R Wunder; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of 1336 consecutive cases at a single center.

Authors:  C-G Schmedt; P Däubler; B J Leibl; K Kraft; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; M Müller; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

7.  Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats.

Authors:  Hugo Nary Filho; Mariza Akemi Matsumoto; Aline Carvalho Batista; Luís Cesar Lopes; Fernanda Costa Grizzo Sampaio de Góes; Alberto Consolaro
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2002

8.  Persistent extracellular matrix remodelling at the interface to polymers used for hernia repair.

Authors:  K Junge; R Rosch; L Bialasinski; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.745

9.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  H Scheidbach; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  15 in total

1.  Impact of endoscopic and histological evaluations of two different types of mesh plug for a groin hernia model.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Mandai; Minoru Naito; Tatsuro Hayashi; Hiroaki Asano; Hideo Ino; Kazunori Tsukuda; Shinichiro Miyoshi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Inflammatory reaction and neotissue maturation in the early host tissue incorporation of polypropylene prostheses.

Authors:  G Pascual; M Rodríguez; S Sotomayor; B Pérez-Köhler; J M Bellón
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Shrinkage of intraperitoneal onlay mesh in sheep: coated polyester mesh versus covered polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  N B Zinther; P Wara; H Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  The risk of communicating TEP-related infertility risk is an opportunity and not a "Cinderella concern" any more.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Bijendra K Sinha; Krishan C Mahajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial.

Authors:  A Coda; R Lamberti; S Martorana
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Shrinkage evaluation of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene meshes in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A C Silvestre; G B de Mathia; D J Fagundes; L R Medeiros; M I Rosa
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  A comparison of two types of preperitoneal mesh prostheses in stoma surgery: application to an animal model.

Authors:  G Tadeo; J Picazo; C Moreno; R Cuesta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh.

Authors:  Ernst J P Schoenmaeckers; Steef B A van der Valk; Huib W van den Hout; Johan F T J Raymakers; Srdjan Rakic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Mesh fixation with fibrin glue (Tissucol/Tisseel) in hernia repair dependent on the mesh structure--is there an optimum fibrin-mesh combination?--investigations on a biomechanical model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, double blind pilot-study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the non-absorbable Optilene Mesh Elastic versus the partly absorbable Ultrapro Mesh for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Christoph Seiler; Petra Baumann; Peter Kienle; Andreas Kuthe; Jens Kuhlgatz; Rainer Engemann; Moritz V Frankenberg; Hanns-Peter Knaebel
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.