Literature DB >> 22744139

The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients.

Erin M Ingvalson1, Brienne Lee, Pamela Fiebig, Patrick C M Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if short-term computerized speech-in-noise training can produce significant improvements in speech-in-noise perception by cochlear implant (CI) recipients on standardized audiologic testing measures.
METHOD: Five adult postlingually deafened CI recipients participated in 4 speech-in-noise training sessions using the Seeing and Hearing Speech program (Sensimetrics; Malden, MA). Each participant completed lessons concentrating on consonant and vowel recognition at word, phrase, and sentence levels. Speech-in-noise abilities were assessed using the QuickSIN (Killion, Niquette, Gudmundsen, Revit, & Banerjee, 2004) and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT ( Nilsson, Soli & Sullivan, 1994)).
RESULTS: All listeners significantly improved key word identification on the HINT after training, albeit only at the most favorable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Listeners also showed a significant reduction in the degree of SNR loss on the QuickSIN after training.
CONCLUSION: Short-term speech-in-noise training may improve speech-in-noise perception in postlingually deafened adult CI recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22744139      PMCID: PMC6771930          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0291)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  28 in total

1.  Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Mead C Killion; Patricia A Niquette; Gail I Gudmundsen; Lawrence J Revit; Shilpi Banerjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Quentin Summerfield; G R Barton; J Toner; C McAnallen; D Proops; C Harries; H Cooper; I Court; R Gray; J Osborne; M Doran; R Ramsden; D Mawman; M O'Driscoll; J Graham; W Aleksy; L Meerton; C Verschure; P Ashcroft; M Pringle
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Elisabet Sundewall-Thorén
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  What can be expected from a late cochlear implantation?

Authors:  Maria-Izabel Kos; Marielle Deriaz; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  What subcortical-cortical relationships tell us about processing speech in noise.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Frederic Marmel; Julia Bair; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Ruth A Litovsky; Michael J Strube; Francis Kuk
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Bradford G Bichey; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Relating structure to function: Heschl's gyrus and acoustic processing.

Authors:  Catherine Warrier; Patrick Wong; Virginia Penhune; Robert Zatorre; Todd Parrish; Daniel Abrams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Two-eared listening in dynamic situations.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Michael Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  16 in total

1.  Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Sumitrajit Dhar; Patrick C M Wong; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Sejal Kuvadia; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The Effect of Short-Term Auditory Training on Speech in Noise Perception and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nathan Barlow; Suzanne C Purdy; Mridula Sharma; Ellen Giles; Vijay Narne
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

4.  How Does Auditory Training Work? Joined-Up Thinking and Listening.

Authors:  Melanie Ferguson; Helen Henshaw
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

5.  Options for Auditory Training for Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Anne D Olson
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

6.  Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Priyanka Reddy; Cheng Ma; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Benefits of phoneme discrimination training in a randomized controlled trial of 50- to 74-year-olds with mild hearing loss.

Authors:  Melanie A Ferguson; Helen Henshaw; Daniel P A Clark; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Training to improve language outcomes in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-14

10.  Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert Ljung; Anatole Nöstl; Emma Threadgold; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.