Literature DB >> 34772887

Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults.

James R Dornhoffer1, Priyanka Reddy, Cheng Ma, Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac, Judy R Dubno, Theodore R McRackan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess associations between postcochlear implant (CI) auditory training and early outcomes related to speech recognition and CI quality of life (CIQOL). STUDY
DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective cohort.
SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Seventy-two adults undergoing cochlear implantation for bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss.
INTERVENTIONS: Self-reported use of three categories of auditory training post-CI activation: (1) face-to-face training (e.g., speech pathologist), (2) passive home-based training (e.g., listening to audiobooks), and (3) computer-based training (e.g., interactive software). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phoneme (CNCp), CNC word (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet, and CIQOL-35 Profile global and domain scores from pre-CI to 3-month post-CI.
RESULTS: Of 72 patients, 52 (72.2%) used an auditory training resource. Of all patients, 18.4% used face-to-face training, 58.3% passive home-based training, and 33.3% computer-based training. At 3 months post-CI, use of any training was associated with greater improvement in speech recognition (d-range = 0.57-0.85) and global and domain-specific CIQOL scores, except entertainment (d-range = -0.33 to 0.77). Use of computer-based training demonstrated the greatest effect, with larger improvements in speech recognition (CNCp: d = 0.69[0.03,1.35]; CNCw: d = 0.80[0.14,1.46]; AzBio: d = 1.11[0.44,1.77]) and global and all domain-specific CIQOL scores (d-range = 0.05-1.35). Controlling for age, sex, household income, and use of multiple training resources, computer-based training remained the strongest positive predictor of speech recognition and CIQOL improvement, with significant associations with CNCp (ß = 33.07[1,43,64.719]), AzBio (ß = 33.03[5.71,60.35]), and CIQOL-global (ß = 10.92[1.15,20.70]) score improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence-based recommendations for use of specific auditory training resources for new adult CI recipients. Auditory training, especially self-directed computer software, resulted in improved speech recognition and CIQOL outcomes after 3 months and are widely available for CI users.
Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34772887      PMCID: PMC8752503          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  49 in total

1.  Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults.

Authors:  Nahla A Gomaa; Jay T Rubinstein; Mary W Lowder; Richard S Tyler; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Michael Buschermöhle; Ville Sivonen; Tytti Willberg; Antti A Aarnisalo; Thomas Lenarz; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Robert Sweetow; Catherine V Palmer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jon K Shallop; Anna Mary Peterson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Brienne Lee; Pamela Fiebig; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the United States.

Authors:  Adele M Goman; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Nichole C Dwyer; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Stephen M Camarata; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Robert T Dwyer; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Shreya Chidarala; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 8.961

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.