Literature DB >> 12918610

Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use.

Thomas Lunner1.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate possible relationships between cognitive function and hearing aid use. In Experiment 1, 72 first-time hearing aid users were tested for speech recognition in noise (Hagerman sentence test) with and without hearing aids. Cognitive function was assessed by tests of working memory (reading span test) and verbal information-processing speed. The results indicate that, after controlling for age and hearing loss, significant correlations exist between the measures of cognitive performance and speech recognition in noise, both with and without hearing aids. High cognitive performance was associated with high performance in the speech recognition task. In Experiment 2, 17 first-time hearing aid users with either high or low working-memory capacity tested an experimental hearing aid which processed the sound differently depending on whether or not speech was detected. The results revealed that those with high working-memory capacity were better than those with low capacity at identifying and reporting the specific processing effects of the aid. This may have implications for how reported results should be interpreted in a research context, how a person's rehabilitation needs are formulated, and how hearing aid controls should be supervised. In conclusion, careful attention should be paid to the cognitive status of listeners, as it can have a significant influence on their ability to utilize their hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12918610     DOI: 10.3109/14992020309074624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  105 in total

Review 1.  Problems hearing in noise in older adults: a review of spatial processing disorder.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Louise Hickson; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-08

2.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

3.  The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-10-05

Review 4.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

Review 5.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Matthew H Burk; Lauren E Strauser; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Is cognitive function in adults with hearing impairment improved by the use of hearing AIDS?

Authors:  A Young Choi; Hyun Joon Shim; Sung Hee Lee; Sang Won Yoon; Eun-Jeong Joo
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Effects of Steady-State Noise on Verbal Working Memory in Young Adults.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Mary Alt; Gayle DeDe; Sarah Olson; James Shehorn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 9.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

10.  Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Bailey Tatge; Diana Irwin; Daniel Corts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.